Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Apr;62(4):1377-83.
doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.4.1377.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on hepatic blood flow and performance

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on hepatic blood flow and performance

G M Matuschak et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Apr.

Abstract

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may impair extrapulmonary organ function. However, the effects of PEEP on the liver are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that at a constant cardiac output (CO), PEEP does not induce changes in hepatic blood flow (QL) and parenchymal performance. In splenectomized, close-chested canine preparations (group I, n = 6), QL was derived as hepatic outflow using electromagnetic flow probes (QLemf), and hepatic performance was defined by extraction and clearance of indocyanine green (ICG). In a noninvasive model (group II, n = 7), the effects of PEEP on hepatic performance alone were similarly analyzed. Measurements were taken during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV1), after addition of 10 cmH2O PEEP to IPPV (PEEP1), during continued PEEP but after return of CO to IPPV1 levels by intravascular volume infusions (PEEP2), and after removal of both PEEP and excess blood volume (IPPV2). Phasic inspiratory decreases in QLemf present during positive-pressure ventilation were not increased during either PEEP1 or PEEP2. Mean QLemf decreased proportionately with CO during PEEP1 (P less than 0.05), but was restored to IPPV1 levels in a parallel fashion with CO during PEEP2. The ICG pharmacokinetic responses to PEEP were complex, with differential effects on extraction and clearance. Despite this, hepatic performance was not imparied in either group. we conclude that global QL reductions during PEEP are proportional to PEEP-induced decreases in CO and are preventable by returning CO to pre-PEEP levels by intravascular volume infusions. However, covarying changes in blood volume and hepatic outflow resistance may independently modulate hepatic function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources