Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database
- PMID: 29551470
- DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database
Abstract
Background: According to recent American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimates, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most commonly performed procedure in the United States (~53.8% of all bariatric procedures), followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; 23.1% of all procedures).
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of these 2 procedures in the first 30 days postoperatively using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry.
Setting: University health network, United States.
Methods: We reviewed all SG and RYGB cases entered between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. Demographic characteristics and 30-day outcomes were analyzed based on separate Mann-Whitney rank sums tests, χ2, or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate, with P<.05 denoting statistical significance and no adjustment for multiple testing.
Results: A total of 141,646 patients were analyzed; 98,292 underwent SG and 43,354 underwent RYGB. Average age was 44.5 and 45.4 years for SG and RYGB, respectively. Preoperative body mass index was 45.1 and 46.1 for SG and RYGB, respectively. The 30-day mortality was .1% for SG and .2% for RYGB (P<.05). The incidence of unplanned intensive care unit admission after RYGB was twice as high compared with SG (1.3% versus .6%, respectively, P<.05). The incidence of at least 1 intervention or reoperation after RYGB was significantly higher compared with SG (2.8% and 2.5% for GB versus 1.2% and 1% for SG, P<.05). After RYGB, .4% of patients had a drain left in place at 30 days postoperatively versus .3% for SG (P<.05). The incidence of readmission was 2.8% for RYGB and 1.2% for SG (P<.05).
Conclusions: The incidence of postoperative complications in the first 30 days after surgery is low for both RYGB and SG. However, SG seems to have a better safety profile in the first 30 days postoperatively compared with RYGB. These findings should be considered in the preoperative evaluation and counseling of bariatric patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to compare safety and efficacy of SG versus RYGB.
Keywords: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Comment on: 30-Day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (GB): first report based on MBSAQIP database.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):551-553. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. PMID: 29551471 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Mar;18(3):326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 13. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022. PMID: 34896012
-
Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Mar;17(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021. PMID: 33257274
-
Perioperative Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04175-x. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 31598899 Free PMC article.
-
The safety profile of one-anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program analysis.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Dec;20(12):1351-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.035. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024. PMID: 39368962 Review.
-
The incidence of iron deficiency anemia post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3002-3010. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07092-3. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31485928
Cited by
-
Missing Something? Comparisons of Effectiveness and Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery Procedures and Their Preferred Reporting: Refining the Evidence Base.Obes Surg. 2020 Aug;30(8):3167-3177. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04659-1. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 32415632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Early Days of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Narrative Review.Obes Surg. 2025 Jun;35(6):2303-2309. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07859-9. Epub 2025 Apr 10. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 40208512 Review.
-
Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral.Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):521-526. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04204-9. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 31625056
-
Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair with Sleeve Gastrectomy: A 5-Year Analysis.JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4):e2020.00066. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00066. JSLS. 2020. PMID: 33414611 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison Between the Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RNYGB) in Patients With Morbid Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2022 Nov 9;14(11):e31309. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31309. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36398039 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials