The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)
- PMID: 29551485
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.014
The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes between renal hilar tumors and non-hilar tumors after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAPN from December 2009 to September 2015 at our institution was recruited. Perioperative outcomes including demographic characteristics, perioperative, pathological and renal function outcomes were compared between the hilar group (n = 30) and non-hilar group (n = 170).
Results: In characteristics, hilar group was younger (52.4 vs. 58 years, p = 0.04) and had less body mass index (23.7 vs. 25.4 kg/m2, p = 0.018). Hilar group had larger tumor size (4.8 vs. 3.7 cm, p = 0.009), higher Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score (10.7 vs. 8.5, p < 0.001) and higher RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior description and the location relative to polar lines) score (9.0 vs. 7.4, p < 0.001). Hilar tumor was associated with longer operative time (293.6 vs. 240.5 min, p = 0.001) and warm ischemia time (39.9 vs. 21.8 min, p < 0.001). But there was no statistically difference in estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative stay and complication rate. For pathological outcomes, there was no difference of positive margin rate and pathological T stage between these groups. For renal function outcomes, hilar tumor patients had no difference of the change of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at postoperative 6 and 12 month as compared with non-hilar tumor patients.
Conclusion: For renal hilar tumor, RAPN could provide acceptable results of perioperative, pathological and renal function outcome as compared with non-hilar tumor group. Thus RAPN is a safe and effective nephron-sparing surgery technique for renal hilar tumors.
Keywords: Kidney neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Robotics.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes.Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.072. Epub 2013 Apr 17. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23601446
-
Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Tumors: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncological Outcomes.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Apr;16(2):e391-e396. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29074284
-
Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity.BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6):903-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12751. Epub 2014 Aug 11. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24673750
-
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for technically challenging renal tumors (completely endophytic and hilar): a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 10;19(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02307-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40208473
-
A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes: Comparing Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Open Partial Nephrectomy in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Tumors.Cureus. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):e79827. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79827. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40166509 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors.Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):390-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Aug 1. Asian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 38024426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar tumors: A propensity-matched analysis.Indian J Urol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):318-324. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_136_21. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Indian J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34759522 Free PMC article.
-
Do hilar clamping and renorrhaphy influence postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy?GHM Open. 2024 Jul 31;4(1):42-46. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01012. GHM Open. 2024. PMID: 40144747 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for special types of renal tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic): an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;13:1178592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178592. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37152053 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic and hilar lesions.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Aug;57(8):2359-2370. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04431-3. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39994145
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous