Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;17(1):26-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

Screening and Surveillance of Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis

Affiliations
Review

Screening and Surveillance of Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis

Sofia Simona Jakab et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;17(5):1009. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30879982 No abstract available.

Abstract

Gastro-esophageal varices (GEV) and variceal hemorrhage (VH) are clinical milestones in the natural history of cirrhosis, as they are closely related to the severity of portal hypertension and define specific stages in disease progression. Variceal hemorrhage is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis and is one of the clinical complications that defines cirrhosis decompensation. The goal of screening and surveillance of varices is to identify patients with GEV at a high risk of bleeding, so that prevention strategies can be implemented. There have been significant updates in the management of GEV over the last years, particularly in the use of non-invasive methods to assess the degree of portal hypertension and the likelihood of having GEV. This paper is focused on esophageal varices with or without extension along the lesser curvature (type 1 or GOV1), as special considerations are required for the management of cardiofundal varices (GOV2 - esophageal varices extending into the fundus, or IGV1 - isolated gastric varices in the fundus) or isolated gastric varices type 2 (IGV2 – gastric varices elsewhere in the stomach, not in the fundus).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No relevant conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening and surveillance of varices in patients with cirrhosis. cACLD, compensated advanced chronic liver disease; LS, liver stiffness; plts, platelet count (103/mL); CSPH, clinically significant portal hypertension; EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy; HRV, high-risk varices; NSBB, non-selective beta-blockers; EVL, endoscopic variceal ligation.

References

    1. Franchis R Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–752. - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017 Jan;65(1):310–335. - PubMed
    1. D’Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, et al. Competing risks and prognostic stages of cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort study of 494 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:1180–1193. - PubMed
    1. Kovalak M, Lake J, Mattek N, et al. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhotic patients: data from a national endoscopic database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:82–88. - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Bosch J, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 24;353(21):2254–61. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms