Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;15(4):4988-4996.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7984. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Programmed death ligand 1 expression in esophageal cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy: Prognostic significance and association with inflammatory biomarkers

Affiliations

Programmed death ligand 1 expression in esophageal cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy: Prognostic significance and association with inflammatory biomarkers

Yating Tang et al. Oncol Lett. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Immunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents has demonstrated promising efficacy for the treatment of various types of malignancies. However, the role of PD-L1 as a tumor prognostic marker remains poorly understood. In the present study, the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in esophageal carcinoma (EC) following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was investigated, and its associations with three systemic inflammation biomarkers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were further explored. A total of 104 patients with non-metastatic EC, who underwent definitive CRT between January 2009 and December 2012, were retrospectively analyzed. The expression of PD-L1 was examined by immunohistochemistry and the impact of PD-L1 expression level on overall survival (OS) was assessed. Furthermore, pretreatment neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet and monocyte counts were obtained from routine blood tests to calculate the NLR, PLR and LMR. PD-L1 was overexpressed in EC compared with normal esophageal epithelium, with a positive expression rate of 37.5%. Additionally, patients with positive PD-L1 expression had a lower NLR than those with negative PD-L1 expression (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, the positive staining of PD-L1 was significantly associated with improved OS (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.372-0.965; P=0.035). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a similar result (P=0.009). Additionally, sex (HR, 0.449; 95% CI, 0.229-0.880; P=0.020), clinical stage III (HR, 2.471; 95% CI, 1.171-5.212; P=0.018), and receipt of concurrent chemoradiation (HR, 0.590; 95% CI, 0.368-0.945; P=0.028) were all independent prognostic factors in EC treated with definitive CRT. The correlation of NLR with PD-L1 expression validated the relevance of immunity and inflammation. In summary, the present study demonstrated that positive PD-L1 expression is associated with improved survival in patients with EC treated with radical CRT, indicating that PD-L1 is a promising prognostic marker.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; lymphocyte-monocyte ratio; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-lymphocyte ratio; prognostic factors; programmed death ligand 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PD-L1 expression in EC and normal esophageal epithelium. (A) No PD-L1 staining in normal esophageal epithelium (magnification, ×200). (B) Negative expression of PD-L1 in EC (magnification, ×200). (C) Positive expression of PD-L1 in the cytoplasm and membrane of EC cells (magnification, ×100). (D) Positive expression of PD-L1 in the cytoplasm and membrane of EC cells (magnification, ×200). PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; EC, esophageal carcinoma.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlation between PD-L1 and NLR, LMR and PLR. The two groups, divided according to the positive or negative expression of PD-L1, exhibited differences in NLR values (P=0.001, Student's t-test), whereas PLR and LMR did not differ significantly between the groups (P=0.448 and P=0.056, respectively). PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; LMR; lymphocyte-monocyte ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves showing differences in overall survival rates according to (A) sex, (B) clinical stage, (C) receipt of concurrent chemoradiation, and (D) PD-L1 expression in patients with esophageal carcinoma. P-values were determined by log-rank test. PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. The incidence and mortality of major cancers in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35:73. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0137-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Läärä E, Muir CS. Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980. Int J Cancer. 1988;41:184–197. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910410205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA, Jr, Al-Sarraf M, Byhardt R, Russell AH, Beitler JJ, Spencer S, et al. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation therapy oncology group. JAMA. 1999;281:1623–1627. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajani JA, Winter K, Komaki R, Kelsen DP, Minsky BD, Liao Z, Bradley J, Fromm M, Hornback D, Willett CG. Phase II randomized trial of two nonoperative regimens of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus: RTOG 0113. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4551–4556. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed