Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;79(2):182-189.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.182.

Advancing Analytic Approaches to Address Key Questions in Mechanisms of Behavior Change Research

Affiliations

Advancing Analytic Approaches to Address Key Questions in Mechanisms of Behavior Change Research

Kevin A Hallgren et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Interest in studying mechanisms of behavior change (MOBCs) in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments has grown considerably in the past two decades. Much of this work has focused on identifying which variables statistically mediate the effect of SUD treatments on clinical outcomes. However, a fuller conceptualization of MOBCs will require greater understanding of questions that extend beyond traditional mediation analysis, including better understanding of when MOBCs change during treatment, when they are most critical to aiding the initiation or maintenance of change, and how MOBCs themselves arise as a function of treatment processes.

Method: In the present study, we review why these MOBC-related questions are often minimally addressed in empirical research and provide examples of data analytic methods that may address these issues. We highlight several recent studies that have used such methods and discuss how these methods can provide unique theoretical insights and actionable clinical information.

Results: Several statistical approaches can enhance the field's understanding of the timing and development of MOBCs, including growth-curve modeling, time-varying effect modeling, moderated mediation analysis, dynamic systems modeling, and simulation methods.

Conclusions: Adopting greater diversity in methods for modeling MOBCs will help researchers better understand the timing and development of key change variables and will expand the theoretical precision and clinical impact of MOBC research. Advances in research design, measurement, and technology are key to supporting these advances.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aiemagno S. A., Cochran D., Feucht T. E., Stephens R. C., Butts J. M., Wolfe S. A. Assessing substance abuse treatment needs among the homeless: A telephone-based interactive voice response system. American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86:1626–1628. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.11.1626. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apostolopoulos Y., Lemke M. K., Barry A. E., Lich K. H. Moving alcohol prevention research forward—Part I: Introducing a complex systems paradigm. Addiction. Advance online publication. 2017 doi:10.1111/add.13955. - PubMed
    1. Atkins D. C., Steyvers M., Imel Z. E., Smyth P. Scaling up the evaluation of psychotherapy: Evaluating motivational interviewing fidelity via statistical text classification. Implementation Science. 2014;9:49. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. - PubMed
    1. Bauer D. J., Preacher K. J., Gil K. M. Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods. 2006;11:142–163. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142. - PubMed

Publication types