Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;39(5):397-404.
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000825.

The value of 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT/CT in evaluation of patients with painful knee prosthesis

Affiliations

The value of 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT/CT in evaluation of patients with painful knee prosthesis

Ramin Mandegaran et al. Nucl Med Commun. 2018 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the incremental value of technetium-99m-methyl diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over Tc-MDP two-phase bone scan (TPBS) in the assessment of the patients with pain following knee arthroplasty.

Patients and methods: Tc-MDP TPBS and Tc-MDP SPECT/CT were performed in 49 patients with knee pain after knee arthroplasty. The scans were reviewed by two readers (nuclear medicine physician and musculoskeletal radiologist). Tc-MDP SPECT/CT studies were interpreted in conjunction with TPBS in this retrospective study to identify the pain generator in painful knee prosthesis. The final diagnosis was established based on a combination of histopathological/cytological findings, other imaging findings (e.g. MRI, radiolabelled white scan), clinical decisions, and management outcomes (including subsequent intraoperative findings).

Results: In diagnosing infection or aseptic loosening, a definitive outcome regarding the presence/absence of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection was obtained in 41 patients. (a) Sensitivity of Tc-MDP SPECT/CT [100%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 66.4-100%] was higher than Tc-MDP TPBS (88.9%; 95% CI: 51.8-99.7%). (b) Specificity of Tc-MDP SPECT/CT (75%; 95% CI: 53.3-90.2%) was considerably higher than Tc-MDP TPBS (30%; 95% CI: 11.9-54.3%). Alternative diagnoses were identified in 21/49 (43%) patients on Tc-MDP SPECT/CT, which could not be ascertained on Tc-MDP TPBS alone.

Conclusion: Tc-MDP SPECT/CT has better sensitivity and specificity compared with Tc-MDP TPBS in diagnosis of aseptic loosening and periprosthestic infection in patients with painful knee arthroplasty. Tc-MDP SPECT/CT identified alternative causes of pain in 43% of patients, which was not identified by Tc-MDP TPBS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances