Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):45.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0990-5.

Pretreatment prognostic factors of survival and late toxicities for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Affiliations

Pretreatment prognostic factors of survival and late toxicities for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Yun-Hsuan Lin et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: To scrutinize the pretreatment prognosticators on survival and late toxicities in a homogenous cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT).

Methods: A total of 219 non-distant metastatic NPC patients consecutively treated by SIB-IMRT at a single institute were collected. The pretreatment factors including the socio-demographic variables, TNM stages, gross tumor volume (GTV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA, and hematologic inflammatory markers were analyzed. Cox model was used to screen the prognostic factors of late toxicities and four survival outcomes including locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Statistically significant inter-correlations were observed between the values of EBV-DNA, some hematologic inflammatory markers, GTV, and N classification. The 5-year LRRFS, DMFS, FFS, and OS rates were 87.9%, 89.4%, 79.4%, and 81.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced N classification (N2-3 vs. N0-1) remained the only significant negative prognosticator for all the four survival outcomes. An increased monocyte percentage and a decreased lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio were significantly associated with poorer FFS and OS, respectively. Larger GTV was observed to be predictive of poorer LRRFS. Patients with T3-4 (HR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.0-12.1, p = 0.048) or higher GTV (HR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.001-1.011, p = 0.027) were associated with higher incidence of radiation neuropathy.

Conclusion: N classification remains the most significant survival predictor for NPC patients treated by SIB-IMRT after adjusting these biomarkers. GTV impacts not only on locoregional control but also radiation neuropathy.

Keywords: Epstein-Barr virus DNA; Gross tumor volume; Hematologic inflammatory marker; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study obtained ethics approval from the Institutional review board/Ethics committee (IRB/EC) of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survival comparisons of NPC patients by different pretreatment biomarkers based on the cutoff point through ROC curve analysis: (a) Failure-free survival for those with monocyte percentage < 7.2% vs. ≥ 7.2%; (b) Overall survival for those with L/M ratio ≥ 4.3 vs. < 4.3; (c) Locoregional relapse-free survival for those with gross tumor volume < 67.5 ml vs. ≥ 67.5 ml
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative incidence rate of radiation neuropathy for those with gross tumor volume < 64.5 ml vs. ≥ 64.5 ml

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wee JT, Ha TC, Loong SL, Qian CN. Is nasopharyngeal cancer really a “Cantonese cancer”? Chin J Cancer. 2010;29(5):517–526. doi: 10.5732/cjc.009.10329. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Songthong AP, Kannarunimit D, Chakkabat C, Lertbutsayanukul C. A randomized phase II/III study of adverse events between sequential (SEQ) versus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma; preliminary result on acute adverse events. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:166. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0472-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS, Straube W, Glisson B, Xia P, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3684–3690. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin S, Pan J, Han L, Zhang X, Liao X, Lu JJ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(4):1071–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong FC, Ng AW, Lee VH, Lui CM, Yuen KK, Sze WK, et al. Whole-field simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(1):138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.084. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources