Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar 19;22(4):24.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0678-4.

Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Revascularization and Acute Ischemic Stroke

Affiliations
Review

Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Revascularization and Acute Ischemic Stroke

Kathryn F Kirchoff-Torres et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but significant complication after carotid revascularization and is increasingly recognized after acute stroke treatments. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of CHS, clinical presentation including ipsilateral headache, seizures, and focal neurological deficits, and radiographic presentation. We propose preventive therapies with emphasis on acute stroke post-thrombectomy hyperperfusion.

Recent findings: CHS was first described after carotid revascularization but is now also reported in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Proposed criteria involve a combination of new clinical symptoms, radiographic evidence of hyperperfusion, and/or presence of intracerebral hemorrhage occurring within 30 days after the carotid or intracranial vessel manipulation. Strongest risk factors include reduced cerebral vasoreactivity, contralateral stenosis of ≥ 70%, post-procedure hypertension, and recent ipsilateral stroke. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood but is likely due to increase in cerebral blood flow and impaired cerebral autoregulation, particularly in the areas of disrupted blood-brain barrier, as well as baroreceptor dysfunction during carotid surgery. Strict blood pressure control pre-, during, and post-procedure is recommended, depending on the recanalization status of the vessel. However, there is no randomized data regarding the goal blood pressure to prevent cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. With technical advances, carotid or intracranial vessel manipulation is increasingly common. CHS is a likely under-recognized and serious complication of carotid revascularization and intracranial thrombectomy. Awareness of and surveillance for CHS is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. Future research should focus on validation of proposed diagnostic criteria and determining optimal post-procedure hemodynamic management to prevent CHS.

Keywords: Acute stroke; Carotid artery stenting; Carotid endarterectomy; Cerebral hyperperfusion; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26(3):E4 - PubMed
    1. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2016 Sep 06;8(1):7 - PubMed
    1. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(2):144-50 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Sci. 2017 Oct 15;381:74-82 - PubMed
    1. J Stroke. 2016 Jan;18(1):21-30 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources