Comparison of Static versus Dynamic Ultrasound for the Detection of Endotracheal Intubation
- PMID: 29560074
- PMCID: PMC5851519
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2017.12.36714
Comparison of Static versus Dynamic Ultrasound for the Detection of Endotracheal Intubation
Abstract
Introduction: In the emergency department setting, it is essential to rapidly and accurately confirm correct endotracheal tube (ETT) placement. Ultrasound is an increasingly studied modality for identifying ETT location. However, there has been significant variation in techniques between studies, with some using the dynamic technique, while others use a static approach. This study compared the static and dynamic techniques to determine which was more accurate for ETT identification.
Methods: We performed this study in a cadaver lab using three different cadavers to represent variations in neck circumference. Cadavers were randomized to either tracheal or esophageal intubation in equal proportions. Blinded sonographers then assessed the location of the ETT using either static or dynamic sonography. We assessed accuracy of sonographer identification of ETT location, time to identification, and operator confidence.
Results: A total of 120 intubations were performed: 62 tracheal intubations and 58 esophageal intubations. The static technique was 93.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84.3% to 98.2%]) sensitive and 98.3% specific (95% CI [90.8% to 99.9%]). The dynamic technique was 92.1% (95% CI [82.4% to 97.4%]) sensitive and 91.2% specific (95% CI [80.7% to 97.1%]). The mean time to identification was 6.72 seconds (95% CI [5.53 to 7.9] seconds) in the static technique and 6.4 seconds (95% CI [5.65 to 7.16] seconds) in the dynamic technique. Operator confidence was 4.9/5.0 (95% CI [4.83 to 4.97]) in the static technique and 4.86/5.0 (95% CI [4.78 to 4.94]) in the dynamic technique. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for any of the outcomes.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that both the static and dynamic sonography approaches were rapid and accurate for confirming ETT location with no statistically significant difference between modalities. Further studies are recommended to compare these techniques in ED patients and with more novice sonographers.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of endotracheal tube twisting on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for intubation confirmation.Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1332-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 23. Am J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31862192 Clinical Trial.
-
Variation in the accuracy of ultrasound for the detection of intubation by endotracheal tube size.Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):706-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Jul 12. Am J Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30029816 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of saline versus air for identifying endotracheal intubation with ultrasound.Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;58:131-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.053. Epub 2022 Jun 2. Am J Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35679656 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasonography for the Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;72(6):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Aug 14. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30119943
-
Ultrasonography for Verification of Endotracheal Tube Position in Neonates and Infants.Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;34(7):627-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597846. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Am J Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28030872 Review.
Cited by
-
Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Respiratory Failure.Lung. 2020 Feb;198(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00309-1. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Lung. 2020. PMID: 31894411 Review.
-
Application of bedside real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of emergency endotracheal intubation in patients in the intensive care unit.J Int Med Res. 2020 Apr;48(4):300060519894771. doi: 10.1177/0300060519894771. Epub 2019 Dec 27. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 31880180 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric obesity and anesthetic challenges of metabolic surgery.Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Oct-Dec;16(4):444-451. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_469_22. Epub 2022 Sep 3. Saudi J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 36337415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Point-of-care ultrasound for airway management in the emergency and critical care setting.Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;11(1):22-32. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.094. Epub 2023 Nov 25. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 37620036 Free PMC article.
-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Evaluation and Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;13(9):1541. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091541. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174933 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Li J. Capnography alone is imperfect for endotracheal tube placement confirmation during emergency intubation. J Emerg Med. 2001;20(3):223–9. - PubMed
-
- Das SK, Choupoo NS, Haldar R, et al. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(4):413–23. - PubMed
-
- Chou EH, Dickman E, Tsou PY, et al. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;90:97–103. - PubMed
-
- Chou HC, Chong KM, Sim SS, et al. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013;84(12):1708–12. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous