Management of constipation in patients with Parkinson's disease
- PMID: 29560414
- PMCID: PMC5856748
- DOI: 10.1038/s41531-018-0042-8
Management of constipation in patients with Parkinson's disease
Abstract
A considerable body of research has recently emerged around nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) and their substantial impact on patients' well-being. A prominent example is constipation which occurs in up to two thirds of all PD-patients thereby effecting psychological and social distress and consequently reducing quality of life. Despite the significant clinical relevance of constipation, unfortunately little knowledge exists on effective treatments. Therefore this systematic review aims at providing a synopsis on clinical effects and safety of available treatment options for constipation in PD. For this purpose, three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO) were searched for experimental and quasi-experimental studies investigating the efficacy/effectiveness of interventions in the management of PD-associated constipation. Besides, adverse events were analyzed as secondary outcome. In total, 18 publications were identified involving 15 different interventions, of which none can be attributed sufficient evidence to derive strong recommendations. Nevertheless, some evidence indicates that dietetic interventions with probiotics and prebiotics may reduce symptom burden while providing a very favorable side-effects profile. Furthermore, the use of lubiprostone, macrogol and in the specific case of isolated or prominent outlet obstruction constipation injections of botulinum neurotoxin A into the puborectal muscles may as well be moderately supported. In summary, too little attention has been paid to treatment options for constipation in PD leaving abundant room for further research addressing this topic.
Conflict of interest statement
D.P. has received personal fees from the Boston Scientific Corporation. L.T. reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Union Chimique Belge, Abbvie, Bayer, and Teva; personal fees and non-financial support from General Electric Medical, Desitin, and Archimedes Pharma; personal fees from Bial and Zambon. The remaining author declares no competing financial interests.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
