Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 19;12(Suppl 2):16.
doi: 10.1186/s12918-018-0546-1.

In silico drug combination discovery for personalized cancer therapy

Affiliations

In silico drug combination discovery for personalized cancer therapy

Minji Jeon et al. BMC Syst Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Drug combination therapy, which is considered as an alternative to single drug therapy, can potentially reduce resistance and toxicity, and have synergistic efficacy. As drug combination therapies are widely used in the clinic for hypertension, asthma, and AIDS, they have also been proposed for the treatment of cancer. However, it is difficult to select and experimentally evaluate effective combinations because not only is the number of cancer drug combinations extremely large but also the effectiveness of drug combinations varies depending on the genetic variation of cancer patients. A computational approach that prioritizes the best drug combinations considering the genetic information of a cancer patient is necessary to reduce the search space.

Results: We propose an in-silico method for personalized drug combination therapy discovery. We predict the synergy between two drugs and a cell line using genomic information, targets of drugs, and pharmacological information. We calculate and predict the synergy scores of 583 drug combinations for 31 cancer cell lines. For feature dimension reduction, we select the mutations or expression levels of the genes in cancer-related pathways. We also used various machine learning models. Extremely Randomized Trees (ERT), a tree-based ensemble model, achieved the best performance in the synergy score prediction regression task. The correlation coefficient between the synergy scores predicted by ERT and the actual observations is 0.738. To compare with an existing drug combination synergy classification model, we reformulate the problem as a binary classification problem by thresholding the synergy scores. ERT achieved an F1 score of 0.954 when synergy scores of 20 and -20 were used as the threshold, which is 8.7% higher than that obtained by the state-of-the-art baseline model. Moreover, the model correctly predicts the most synergistic combination, from approximately 100 candidate drug combinations, as the top choice for 15 out of the 31 cell lines. For 28 out of the 31 cell lines, the model predicts the most synergistic combination in the top 10 of approximately 100 candidate drug combinations. Finally, we analyze the results, generate synergistic rules using the features, and validate the rules through the literature survey.

Conclusion: Using various types of genomic information of cancer cell lines, targets of drugs, and pharmacological information, a drug combination synergy prediction pipeline is proposed. The pipeline regresses the synergy level between two drugs and a cell line as well as classifies if there exists synergy or antagonism between them. Discovering new drug combinations by our pipeline may improve personalized cancer therapy.

Keywords: Combination therapy; Synergy prediction; in silico.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Reformatted experimental data from O‘Neil’s dataset for analyzing by Combenefit. b Synergy scores calculated by Combenefit. c For predicting synergy scores, each sample is vectorized. The vector contains drug targets, genomic information of a cell line, pharmacological data, and other external knowledge such as synthetic lethality. d and e Predicted synergy scores calculated using various machine learning models. Pearson correlation coefficient and F1 score were used as the evaluation metrics for the regression models and classification models, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Synergy Score Distribution. The average synergy score of 16,575 samples is 4.52 and the standard deviation is 20.65
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Observation and prediction values obtained by the Extremely Randomized Trees model (correlation coefficient is 0.738)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scannell JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical r&d efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(3):191–200. doi: 10.1038/nrd3681. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clinical Development Success Rates 2006-2015. https://www.bio.org/sites/default/files/ClinicalDevelopmentSuccessRates2.... Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
    1. Huang H, Zhang P, Qu XA, Sanseau P, Yang L. Systematic prediction of drug combinations based on clinical side-effects. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7160. doi: 10.1038/srep07160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U, Workman P. Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(7):679–92. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foucquier J, Guedj M. Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape. Pharmacol Res perspect. 2015;3(3):e00149. doi: 10.1002/prp2.149. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms