Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate
- PMID: 29561487
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004499
Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis for Treatment of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate
Abstract
Objective: This study is to present experiences of using anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis (AMSDO) with internal distractors for treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate.
Materials and methods: A total of 42 patients of maxillary hypoplasia with repaired cleft palate were included in this study, and underwent AMSDO. Cephalometric analysis and speech quality assessments were performed to evaluate the changes after AMSDO and its long-term effect on stability.
Results: All cases had successfully accomplished AMSDO. The average SNA (°), NA-FH (°), ANS-PNS (millimeter), and Overjet (millimeter) have change to 80.41°, 89.51°, 55.64 mm, and 2.52 mm, respectively (P < 0.01). Maxillary advancement has reached 13.80 mm on average (ranging from 10.0 mm to 20.0 mm). Speech quality assessment demonstrated that nasal resonance, speech articulation, nasal emission, intelligibility, and velopharyngeal function did not get worse after AMSDO.
Conclusions: AMSDO has unique advantages as follows: can effectively correct maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate; can create a space for postoperative orthodontic treatment to solve the crowding teeth situation; the postoperative velopharyngeal function and speech quality show no significant change. The results shown AMSDO is an effective and appropriate treanment for curing maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate.
Similar articles
-
Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;38(12):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Aug 31. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19720499
-
Skeletal, dental and facial aesthetic changes following anterior maxillary segmental distraction by tooth-borne device in patients with cleft lip and palate.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;50(6):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33054994
-
Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis--early results.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jan;44(1):23-32. doi: 10.1597/05-003. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007. PMID: 17214524 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15509923 Review.
-
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):CD010403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30095853 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of the maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis in patients with cleft lip and palate.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1409. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05208-3. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39563318 Free PMC article.
-
Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):383-390. doi: 10.1002/cre2.292. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020. PMID: 32233020 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous