Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jun 20;36(18):1823-1830.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5371. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer

Hubert Y Pan et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose To compare the toxicities and cost of proton radiation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer among men younger than 65 years of age with private insurance. Methods Using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, we identified men who received radiation for prostate cancer between 2008 and 2015. Patients undergoing proton therapy and SBRT were propensity score-matched to IMRT patients on the basis of clinical and sociodemographic factors. Proportional hazards models compared the cumulative incidence of urinary, bowel, and erectile dysfunction toxicities by treatment. Cost from a payer's perspective was calculated from claims and adjusted to 2015 dollars. Results A total of 693 proton therapy patients were matched to 3,465 IMRT patients. Proton therapy patients had a lower risk of composite urinary toxicity (33% v 42% at 2 years; P < .001) and erectile dysfunction (21% v 28% at 2 years; P < .001), but a higher risk of bowel toxicity (20% v 15% at 2 years; P = .02). Mean radiation cost was $115,501 for proton therapy patients and $59,012 for IMRT patients ( P < .001). A total of 310 SBRT patients were matched to 3,100 IMRT patients. There were no significant differences in composite urinary, bowel, or erectile dysfunction toxicities between SBRT and IMRT patients ( P > .05), although a higher risk of urinary fistula was noted with SBRT (1% v 0.1% at 2 years; P = .009). Mean radiation cost for SBRT was $49,504 and $57,244 for IMRT ( P < .001). Conclusion Among younger men with prostate cancer, proton radiation was associated with significant reductions in urinary toxicity but increased bowel toxicity at nearly twice the cost of IMRT. SBRT and IMRT were associated with similar toxicity profiles; SBRT was modestly less expensive than IMRT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Cumulative incidence of genitourinary and bowel toxicities among propensity score-matched intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton cohort: (A) any urinary toxicity; (B) urinary incontinence; (C) urinary bleeding/irritation; (D) urinary obstruction; (E) urinary stricture; (F) any bowel toxicity; (G) bowel bleeding/irritation; and (H) erectile dysfunction.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Complication and total health care cost comparison between propensity score–matched intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton cohort: (A) complication cost and (B) total cost. P < .05 at all time points.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Complication and total health care cost comparison between propensity score–matched intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) cohort: (A) complication cost and (B) total cost. (*) Denotes P <. 05 at measured time point.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. : Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1517-1524, 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheets NC, Goldin GH, Meyer AM, et al. : Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA 307:1611-1620, 2012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. : Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:67-74, 2008 - PubMed
    1. Spratt DE, Pei X, Yamada J, et al. : Long-term survival and toxicity in patients treated with high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:686-692, 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slater JD, Rossi CJ, Jr, Yonemoto LT, et al. : Proton therapy for prostate cancer: The initial Loma Linda University experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:348-352, 2004 - PubMed

Publication types