Costs and mortality rates of surgical approaches to hysterectomy in Brazil
- PMID: 29561962
- PMCID: PMC6257415
- DOI: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000129
Costs and mortality rates of surgical approaches to hysterectomy in Brazil
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the costs of hysterectomies performed in Brazil due to benign conditions, and to assess its hospital admittance and mortality rates.
Methods: A retrospective cohort was carried out from January 2010 to December 2014, analyzing all hysterectomies (n = 428,346) registered on the DATASUS database between January 2010 and December 2014. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 for Windows.
Results: Hospital admissions were 300,231 for total abdominal hysterectomies, 46,056 for vaginal hysterectomies, 29,959 for subtotal abdominal hysterectomies and 1,522 for laparoscopic hysterectomies. Mortality rates were 0.26%, 0.09%, 0.07% and 0.05% for subtotal, total abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies, respectively. Among the procedures studied, total abdominal hysterectomies had the most costs (R$217,802,574.77), followed by vaginal hysterectomies (R$24,173,490.00), subtotal abdominal hysterectomies (R$19.253.300,00) and laparoscopic hysterectomies (R$794,680.40).
Conclusions: Total abdominal hysterectomies had the highest overall costs mainly because it was the most commonly performed technique. Mortality rates were greatest in subtotal abdominal hysterectomies; this, however, may be due to bias related to missing data in our database.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736. JSLS. 2012. PMID: 23484557 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.059. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15284779
-
[A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-24. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007. PMID: 17329946 Lithuanian.
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy.Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;11(1):111-36. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(97)80053-3. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997. PMID: 9155939 Review.
-
Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;57(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000009. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24351441 Review.
Cited by
-
Prophylaxis Effect of Metronidazole Vaginal Gel in Decreasing the Risk of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Hysterectomy.J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_66_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. J Res Pharm Pract. 2023. PMID: 38213606 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of hysterectomy and associated factors in Brazilian women aged 50 and older: findings from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSI-Brazil).BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 30;24(1):1747. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19231-0. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38951794 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low- and middle-income countries.Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e62-e72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11052. Br J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30620075 Free PMC article.
-
Cost comparison of gynecologic procedures between the US and a developing country: an observational study.J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):113-117. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01215-6. Epub 2021 Feb 26. J Robot Surg. 2022. PMID: 33635444
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):1156–1158. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Costa AAR, Amorim MMR, Cursino T. Histerectomia vaginal versus histerectomia abdominal em mulheres sem prolapso genital, em maternidade-escola do Recife: ensaio clínico randomizado. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2003;25(3):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032003000300005 - DOI
-
- Dayaratna S, Goldberg J, Harrington C, Leiby BE, McNeil JM. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):120.e1–120.e6. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.028 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37984.623889.F6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Goolab BD. Vaginal hysterectomy and relative merits over abdominal and laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(3):393–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical