Autologous mixed lymphocyte-tumor reaction and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. I. Proliferation of two distinct T-cell subsets
- PMID: 2956198
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910400207
Autologous mixed lymphocyte-tumor reaction and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. I. Proliferation of two distinct T-cell subsets
Abstract
In patients with carcinomatous pleural effusions blood T lymphocytes proliferated in vitro in response to autologous, freshly isolated effusion tumor cells in the autologous mixed lymphocyte-tumor culture (AMLTC) and to autologous blood non-T cells in the autologous mixed lymphocyte culture (AMLC). Treatment of the stimulator cells with the anti-HLA-DR monoclonal antibody (MAb) abrogated the stimulatory capacity in AMLC, but not in AMLTC. A subset of T cells that formed rosettes with autologous erythrocytes showed proliferative response to autologous non-malignant cells, whereas this subset did not respond to autologous tumor cells. Non-adherent lymphocytes were fractionated by centrifugation on discontinuous Percoll density gradients. Medium-sized T lymphocytes were excellent responders in AMLC, but were weak responders in AMLTC. Small T lymphocytes proliferated preferentially in AMLTC, but responded poorly in AMLC. Large granular lymphocytes (LGL) did not proliferate in mixed cultures of either type. Instead, LGL suppressed the T-cell proliferation in AMLTC. The same suppressor LGL, however, had no inhibitory effect on AMLC. Elimination of the CD4 subset reduced or abolished proliferative response in AMLC in all cases, whereas it was ineffective in diminishing the reaction in 6 of 8 AMLTC. In contrast, removal of the CD8 subset decreased or eliminated T-cell proliferation in 4 of 8 AMLTC, but in none of the AMLC. These results indicate that the autoreactive T lymphocytes detectable in response to tumor cells and non-malignant non-T cells differ in several characteristics. Thus, the reaction in the AMLTC is not due to contaminating non-malignant cells in the stimulator population and may be a tumor-induced proliferative response.
Similar articles
-
Autologous mixed lymphocyte-tumor reaction and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. II. Generation of specific and non-specific killer T cells capable of lysing autologous tumor.Int J Cancer. 1988 May 15;41(5):651-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910410502. Int J Cancer. 1988. PMID: 2966771
-
Suppression of T-cell response in autologous mixed lymphocyte-tumor culture by large granular lymphocytes.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986 Mar;76(3):389-98. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986. PMID: 2419621
-
[Autologous mixed lymphocyte culture (AMLC)].Allerg Immunol (Leipz). 1984;30(2):60-73. Allerg Immunol (Leipz). 1984. PMID: 6237558 German.
-
The regulation of antibody secreting cells generated in the autologous mixed leukocyte reaction in man.Behring Inst Mitt. 1983 May;(72):143-52. Behring Inst Mitt. 1983. PMID: 6152687 Review.
-
The autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction (AMLR) as a possible indicator of immunoregulation in chronic inflammatory periodontal disease.J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Aug;13(7):639-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00858.x. J Clin Periodontol. 1986. PMID: 2944916 Review.
Cited by
-
Tumour-associated proliferative responses in vitro of regional lymph nodes draining solid cancers in man.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1989;30(5):300-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01744898. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1989. PMID: 2533881 Free PMC article.
-
Biological significance of autologous tumor-killing activity and its induction therapy.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1993 Jul;37(2):75-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01517038. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1993. PMID: 8319244 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials