Balanced scorecard-based performance evaluation of Chinese county hospitals in underdeveloped areas
- PMID: 29562812
- PMCID: PMC5991253
- DOI: 10.1177/0300060518757606
Balanced scorecard-based performance evaluation of Chinese county hospitals in underdeveloped areas
Abstract
Objective Since the Guangxi government implemented public county hospital reform in 2009, there have been no studies of county hospitals in this underdeveloped area of China. This study aimed to establish an evaluation indicator system for Guangxi county hospitals and to generate recommendations for hospital development and policymaking. Methods A performance evaluation indicator system was developed based on balanced scorecard theory. Opinions were elicited from 25 experts from administrative units, universities and hospitals and the Delphi method was used to modify the performance indicators. The indicator system and the Topsis method were used to evaluate the performance of five county hospitals randomly selected from the same batch of 2015 Guangxi reform pilots. Results There were 4 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators in the final performance evaluation indicator system that showed good consistency, validity and reliability. The performance rank of the hospitals was B > E > A > C > D. Conclusions The performance evaluation indicator system established using the balanced scorecard is practical and scientific. Analysis of the results based on this indicator system identified several factors affecting hospital performance, such as resource utilisation efficiency, medical service price, personnel structure and doctor-patient relationships.
Keywords: China; County hospital; balanced scorecard; indicator system; medically underserved area; performance evaluation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of healthcare reform on health resource allocation and service utilization in 1110 Chinese county hospitals: data from 2006 to 2012.Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Oct;32(4):400-415. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2344. Epub 2016 Mar 14. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017. PMID: 26987758
-
The impact of healthcare reform on the efficiency of public county hospitals in China.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2780-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 29262816 Free PMC article.
-
What is the job satisfaction and active participation of medical staff in public hospital reform: a study in Hubei province of China.Hum Resour Health. 2015 May 16;13:34. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0026-2. Hum Resour Health. 2015. PMID: 25975721 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of common indicators of hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Mar 31;9:63. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_563_19. eCollection 2020. J Educ Health Promot. 2020. PMID: 32489998 Free PMC article.
-
A Balanced Scorecard for Maximizing Data Performance.Front Big Data. 2022 Mar 31;5:821103. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.821103. eCollection 2022. Front Big Data. 2022. PMID: 35434610 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How to Engage Health Care Workers in the Evaluation of Hospitals: Development and Validation of BSC-HCW1-A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159096. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35897476 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital performance evaluation indicators: a scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 1;24(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10940-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38693562 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review: the dimensions to evaluate health care performance and an implication during the pandemic.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 9;22(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07863-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35534850 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Evaluation of China's TCM Medical Service System: An Empirical Research by Integrated Factor Analysis and TOPSIS.Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 29;8:532420. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.532420. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33117767 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation.BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jul;10(3):e001293. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34244173 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Deepening the Health Care System Reform. The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China Website. http://www.gov.cn/test/2009-04/08/content_1280069.htm. Published March 17, 2009. Accessed February 5, 2017.
-
- Implementation Plan for the Recent Priorities of the Health Care System Reform ( 2009. –2011). The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China Website. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2009-04/07/content_1279256.htm. Published March 18, 2009. Accessed February 5, 2017.
-
- Opinions of Pilot Projects for County-level Public Hospital Reform. The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China Website. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-06/14/content_2161153.htm. Published June 7, 2012. Accessed February 5, 2017.
-
- Kaplan RS andNorton DP.. The balanced scorecard–measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 1992; 70: 70–79. - PubMed
-
- Madsen D andSlåtten K.. The role of the management fashion arena in the cross-national diffusion of management concepts: the case of the balanced scorecard in the Scandinavian countries. Adm Sci 2013; 3: 110–142.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources