Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;28(8):1320-1329.
doi: 10.1177/1049732318764386. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Toward Understanding How Social Factors Shaped a Behavioral Intervention on Healthier Infant Formula-Feeding

Affiliations

Toward Understanding How Social Factors Shaped a Behavioral Intervention on Healthier Infant Formula-Feeding

Cornelia Guell et al. Qual Health Res. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

As part of a process evaluation, we explored in semi-structured interviews the experiences of 19 mothers who had taken part in a trial to reduce infant formula-milk intake and promote healthy weight gain, and reflections of three facilitators who delivered the intervention and control group protocols. Mothers appreciated the nonjudgmental support provided during the trial, after experiencing stigma and receiving limited advice on how, how much, and how often formula-milk should be given. The information mothers had previously found, printed on formula-milk tins, or provided by family, friends, and health professionals was often perceived as contradictory; the trial guidance also conflicted with social norms relating infant health positively with weight gain. For those recruited into the trial with older infants, who had already exceeded the recommendations, reducing formula-milk amounts was difficult. The findings highlight the difficulties of addressing a highly stigmatized, complex social practice with an individual, behavioral intervention approach.

Keywords: Britain; behavior change; complexity; diet, nutrition, malnutrition; infants; mothers, mothering; obesity, overweight; qualitative methods, qualitative; stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asiodu I. V., Waters C. M., Dailey D. E., Lyndon A. (2017). Infant feeding decision-making and the influences of social support persons among first-time African American mothers. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21, 863–872. doi:10.1007/s10995-016-2167-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourdieu P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    1. Brouwer M. A., Drummond C., Willis E. (2012). Using Goffman’s theories of social interaction to reflect first-time mothers’ experiences with the social norms of infant feeding. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1345–1354. doi:10.1177/1049732312451873 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohn S., Clinch M., Bunn C., Stronge P. (2013). Entangled complexity: Why complex interventions are just not complicated enough. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18, 40–43. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, & United Nations University. (2004). Human energy requirements (Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series 1). Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5686e.pdf

Publication types