Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 10;4(2):12.
doi: 10.3390/dj4020012.

Attitudes towards Prosthodontic Clinical Decision-Making for Edentulous Patients among South West Deanery Dental Foundation Year One Dentists

Affiliations

Attitudes towards Prosthodontic Clinical Decision-Making for Edentulous Patients among South West Deanery Dental Foundation Year One Dentists

Andrew Barber et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe Dental Foundation year one dentists' attitudes towards prosthodontic decision making for edentulous patients, and identify whether there are gender differences in these attitudes. All South West Deanery trainees were invited to take part in the study between May and June 2011 and a previously piloted questionnaire was administered to the trainees by their training programme directors. The questionnaire posed questions based upon a clinical scenario of discussing treatment options with patients. Seventy-two questionnaires were used in the analysis (91% overall response rate). Trainees perceived their own values to be less important than the patient's values (p < 0.001) in decision making, but similar to the patient's friend's/relative's values (p = 0.1). In addition, the trainees perceived the patient's values to be less important than their friend's/relatives (p < 0.001). Sixty-six per cent of trainees acknowledged an influence from their own personal values on their presentation of material to patients who are in the process of choosing among different treatment options, and 87% thought their edentulous patients were satisfied with the decision making process when choosing among different treatment options. Fifty-eight per cent of trainees supported a strategy of negotiation between patients and clinicians (shared decision making). There was no strong evidence to suggest gender had an influence on the attitudes towards decision making. The finding of a consensus towards shared decision making in the attitudes of trainees, and no gender differences is encouraging and is supportive of UK dental schools' ability to foster ethical and professional values among dentists.

Keywords: decision making; dentist; dentures; prosthetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The questionnaire used in the survey.
Figure 1
Figure 1
The questionnaire used in the survey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants’ response to Question 3: “How important are your own values (beliefs, priorities & preferences) in helping edentulous patients make treatment decisions?”
Figure 3
Figure 3
Participants’ response to Question 4: “How important do you perceive the edentulous patient’s values (beliefs, priorities, preferences) to be in making treatment decisions?”
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participants’ response to Question 5: “How important do you perceive the values (beliefs, priorities, preferences) of the edentulous patient’s family or friends to be in making treatment decisions?”
Figure 5
Figure 5
Participants’ response to Question 6: “How much do your own personal values (beliefs, priorities & preferences) influence your presentation of material to patients who are in the process of choosing among different treatment options?”
Figure 6
Figure 6
Participants’ response to Question 7: “In general, how satisfied do you think your edentulous patients are with the decision-making process when choosing among different treatment options?”
Figure 7
Figure 7
Male and female participants’ response to Question 4: “How important do you perceive the edentulous patient's values (beliefs, priorities, preferences) to be in making treatment decisions?”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango) Soc. Sci. Med. 1997;44:681–692. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. General Dental Council (GDC) Standards for the Dental Team. General Dental Council; London, UK: 2013. [(accessed on 10 May 2015)]. Available online: http://www.gdc-uk.org/Dentalprofessionals/Standards/Documents/Standards%....
    1. Montgomery A., Fahey T. How do patients’ treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? Qual. Health Care. 2001;10:39–43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown R., Butow P., Wilson-Genderson M., Bernhard J., Ribi K., Juraskova I. Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: Impact on decision-related outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:857–862. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7952. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joosten E., Defuentes-Merillas L., De Weert G., Sensky T., Van Der Staak C., De Jong C. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother. Psychosom. 2008;77:219–226. doi: 10.1159/000126073. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources