Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan-Apr;11(1):38-41.
doi: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_27_2017.

Comparison of choroidal thickness using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes

Affiliations

Comparison of choroidal thickness using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes

Siddharth Narendran et al. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Apr.

Abstract

Background/aims: Choroidal thickness measurements are reported to differ between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT). The aim of this study was to assess the comparability of choroidal thickness measurements using SS-OCT and SD-OCT devices among normal participants.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective study of 31 (62 eyes) normal participants. Choroidal imaging was performed sequentially with the Spectralis OCT (SD-OCT) and the deep range imaging OCT (DRI OCT-1) (SS-OCT) using standardized imaging protocols. The subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFChT) was measured manually by two masked retinal specialists. Paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to compare the measurements.

Results: The mean SFChT was 319.5 μm and 325.3 μm for DRI OCT-1 and Spectralis OCT, respectively (P = 0.001), with a mean difference of 5.9 with ICC of 0.97. The mean difference in choroidal thickness between the OCT devices was larger among eyes with choroidal thickness > 350 μm compared with eyes with thinner choroids (8.0 μm vs. 4.7 μm).

Conclusions: SFChT measurements are comparable between DRI OCT-1 and Spectralis OCT. The variability between the devices increases in thicker choroids.

Keywords: Choroidal thickness; spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; swept-source optical coherence tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Optical coherence tomography image showing the measurement of the subfoveal choroidal thickness
Figure 2
Figure 2
Grading of the optical coherence tomography images was done based on the visibility of the chorioscleral interface Grade 1: <25% chorioscleral interface visible, Grade 2: 25%–50% chorioscleral interface visible, Grade 3: 50%–75% chorioscleral interface visible, Grade 4: >75% visible
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot with subfoveal choroidal thickness sorted by spectralis optical coherence tomography and plotted against deep range imaging-1 optical coherence tomography

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parver LM. Temperature modulating action of choroidal blood flow. Eye (Lond) 1991;5(Pt 2):181–5. - PubMed
    1. Mertz JR, Wallman J. Choroidal retinoic acid synthesis: A possible mediator between refractive error and compensatory eye growth. Exp Eye Res. 2000;70:519–27. - PubMed
    1. McFadden SA, Howlett MH, Mertz JR. Retinoic acid signals the direction of ocular elongation in the guinea pig eye. Vision Res. 2004;44:643–53. - PubMed
    1. Kuroda S, Ikuno Y, Yasuno Y, Nakai K, Usui S, Sawa M, et al. Choroidal thickness in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2013;33:302–8. - PubMed
    1. Wang NK, Lai CC, Chou CL, Chen YP, Chuang LH, Chao AN, et al. Choroidal thickness and biometric markers for the screening of lacquer cracks in patients with high myopia. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53660. - PMC - PubMed