Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar 7:9:431.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00431. eCollection 2018.

Lipid-Based Particles: Versatile Delivery Systems for Mucosal Vaccination against Infection

Affiliations
Review

Lipid-Based Particles: Versatile Delivery Systems for Mucosal Vaccination against Infection

Blaise Corthésy et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Vaccination is the process of administering immunogenic formulations in order to induce or harness antigen (Ag)-specific antibody and T cell responses in order to protect against infections. Important successes have been obtained in protecting individuals against many deleterious pathological situations after parenteral vaccination. However, one of the major limitations of the current vaccination strategies is the administration route that may not be optimal for the induction of immunity at the site of pathogen entry, i.e., mucosal surfaces. It is now well documented that immune responses along the genital, respiratory, or gastrointestinal tracts have to be elicited locally to ensure efficient trafficking of effector and memory B and T cells to mucosal tissues. Moreover, needle-free mucosal delivery of vaccines is advantageous in terms of safety, compliance, and ease of administration. However, the quest for mucosal vaccines is challenging due to (1) the fact that Ag sampling has to be performed across the epithelium through a relatively limited number of portals of entry; (2) the deleterious acidic and proteolytic environment of the mucosae that affect the stability, integrity, and retention time of the applied Ags; and (3) the tolerogenic environment of mucosae, which requires the addition of adjuvants to elicit efficient effector immune responses. Until now, only few mucosally applicable vaccine formulations have been developed and successfully tested. In animal models and clinical trials, the use of lipidic structures such as liposomes, virosomes, immune stimulating complexes, gas-filled microbubbles and emulsions has proven efficient for the mucosal delivery of associated Ags and the induction of local and systemic immune reponses. Such particles are suitable for mucosal delivery because they protect the associated payload from degradation and deliver concentrated amounts of Ags via specialized sampling cells (microfold cells) within the mucosal epithelium to underlying antigen-presenting cells. The review aims at summarizing recent development in the field of mucosal vaccination using lipid-based particles. The modularity ensured by tailoring the lipidic design and content of particles, and their known safety as already established in humans, make the continuing appraisal of these vaccine candidates a promising development in the field of targeted mucosal vaccination.

Keywords: delivery system; infections; lipidic particles; mucosal; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of lipid-based particles evaluated for mucosal vaccination. Liposomes can be tailored to incorporate particular lipids (cationic lipids, polar lipids from Archea), Influenza extracts or non-ionic surfactants in order to improve stability and immunogenicity of vesicles. Other lipid-based structure incorporating saponin, entrapping inert high molecular gas, or composed of emulsions has been developed for vaccination purposes. Black triangles represent Ags. They can be entrapped in aqueous cores, entrapped in hybrophobic parts, associated at the surface of particles through electrostatic interactions, or covalently linked at the surface of particles. Not drawn on scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andre FE. Vaccinology: past achievements, present roadblocks and future promises. Vaccine (2003) 21(7–8):593–5.10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00702-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plotkin SA. Vaccines: past, present and future. Nat Med (2005) 11(4 Suppl):S5–11.10.1038/nm1209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pulendran B, Ahmed R. Immunological mechanisms of vaccination. Nat Immunol (2011) 12(6):509–17.10.1038/ni.2039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rueckert C, Guzman CA. Vaccines: from empirical development to rational design. PLoS Pathog (2012) 8(11):e1003001.10.1371/journal.ppat.1003001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Temmerman ML, Rejman J, Demeester J, Irvine DJ, Gander B, De Smedt SC. Particulate vaccines: on the quest for optimal delivery and immune response. Drug Discov Today (2011) 16(13–14):569–82.10.1016/j.drudis.2011.04.006 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types