Sessile serrated adenoma detection rate is correlated with adenoma detection rate
- PMID: 29564038
- PMCID: PMC5852399
- DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i3.82
Sessile serrated adenoma detection rate is correlated with adenoma detection rate
Abstract
Aim: To investigated the association between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and sessile serrated ADR (SSADR) and significant predictors for sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) detection.
Methods: This study is a retrospective, single-center analysis. Total colonoscopies performed by the gastroenterologists at the University of Tokyo Hospital between January and December 2014 were retrospectively identified. Polyps were classified as low-grade or high-grade adenoma, cancer, SSA, or SSA with cytological dysplasia, and the prevalence of each type of polyp was investigated. Predictors of adenoma and SSA detection were examined using logistic generalized estimating equation models. The association between ADR and SSADR for each gastroenterologist was investigated by calculating a correlation coefficient weighted by the number of each gastroenterologist's examination.
Results: A total of 3691 colonoscopies performed by 35 gastroenterologists were assessed. Overall, 978 (26.5%) low- and 84 (2.2%) high-grade adenomas, 81 (2.2%) cancers, 66 (1.8%) SSAs, and 2 (0.1%) SSAs with cytological dysplasia were detected. Overall ADR was 29.5% (men 33.2%, women 23.8%) and overall SSADR was 1.8% (men 1.7%, women 2.1%). In addition, 672 low-grade adenomas (68.8% of all the detected low-grade adenomas), 58 (69.9%) high-grade adenomas, 29 (34.5%) cancers, 52 (78.8%) SSAs, and 2 (100%) SSAs with cytological dysplasia were found in the proximal colon. Adenoma detection was the only significant predictor of SSA detection (adjusted OR: 2.53, 95%CI: 1.53-4.20; P < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between ADR and SSADR weighted by the number of each gastroenterologist's examinations was 0.606 (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that ADR is correlated to SSADR. In addition, patients with adenomas had a higher prevalence of SSAs than those without adenomas.
Keywords: Adenoma detection rate; Colonoscopy; Interval colorectal cancer; Sessile serrated adenoma; Sessile serrated adenoma detection rate.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Apr 16;14(4):226-234. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i4.226. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35634484 Free PMC article.
-
Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25083562
-
Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting.Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):755-765.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28843582
-
Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 7;24(29):3250-3259. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i29.3250. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30090005 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and treatment of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with dysplasia/carcinoma.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;34(10):1685-1695. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14752. Epub 2019 Jun 30. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31158302 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and Clinical Features of Sessile Serrated Polyps: A Systematic Review.Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):105-118.e25. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Mar 18. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 32199884 Free PMC article.
-
Improved detection of adenomas and sessile serrated polyps is maintained with continuous audit of colonoscopy.BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;7(1):e000425. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000425. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32675086 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3123-3131. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06419-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. PMID: 32564206 Free PMC article.
-
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E610-E620. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-4095. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Endosc Int Open. 2021. PMID: 33869735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rates.Gastrointest Tumors. 2020 Jul;7(3):74-82. doi: 10.1159/000505622. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Gastrointest Tumors. 2020. PMID: 32903839 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
-
- Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T, Nishimoto H; Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2008: a study of 25 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:388–396. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857. - PubMed
-
- European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group, von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Malila N, Minozzi S, Moss S, Quirke P, Steele RJ, Vieth M, Aabakken L, Altenhofen L, Ancelle-Park R, Antoljak N, Anttila A, Armaroli P, Arrossi S, Austoker J, Banzi R, Bellisario C, Blom J, Brenner H, Bretthauer M, Camargo Cancela M, Costamagna G, Cuzick J, Dai M, Daniel J, Dekker E, Delicata N, Ducarroz S, Erfkamp H, Espinàs JA, Faivre J, Faulds Wood L, Flugelman A, Frkovic-Grazio S, Geller B, Giordano L, Grazzini G, Green J, Hamashima C, Herrmann C, Hewitson P, Hoff G, Holten I, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Kuipers EJ, Kurtinaitis J, Lambert R, Launoy G, Lee W, Leicester R, Leja M, Lieberman D, Lignini T, Lucas E, Lynge E, Mádai S, Marinho J, Maučec Zakotnik J, Minoli G, Monk C, Morais A, Muwonge R, Nadel M, Neamtiu L, Peris Tuser M, Pignone M, Pox C, Primic-Zakelj M, Psaila J, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff D, Rasmussen M, Regula J, Ren J, Rennert G, Rey J, Riddell RH, Risio M, Rodrigues V, Saito H, Sauvaget C, Scharpantgen A, Schmiegel W, Senore C, Siddiqi M, Sighoko D, Smith R, Smith S, Suchanek S, Suonio E, Tong W, Törnberg S, Van Cutsem E, Vignatelli L, Villain P, Voti L, Watanabe H, Watson J, Winawer S, Young G, Zaksas V, Zappa M, Valori R. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45:51–59. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials