Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;27(5):995-1004.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5554-8. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration

Affiliations
Review

A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration

Jayson Lian et al. Eur Spine J. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To review the current literature on methods of accurate numeration of vertebral segments in patients with Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs). LSTVs are a common congenital anomaly of the L5-S1 junction. While their clinical significance has been debated, unquestionable is the need for their identification prior to spinal surgery. We hypothesize that there are no reliable landmarks by which we can accurately number transitional vertebrae, and thus a full spinal radiograph is required.

Methods: A Pubmed and EMBASE search using various combinations of specific key words including "LSTV", "lumbosacral transitional vertebrae", "count", "vertebral numbering", and "number" was performed.

Results: The gold standard for spinal segment numeration in patients with LSTV remains whole spine imaging and counting caudally, starting from C2. If whole spine imaging is not available, the use of the iliac crest tangent sign on coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has fairly reliable sensitivity and specificity (81 and 64-88%, respectively) for accurate numeration of LSTV. The role of paraspinal anatomic markers such as the right renal artery, superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation, and conus medullaris, for identification of vertebral levels is unreliable and should not be used.

Conclusions: A sagittal whole spine view should be added as a scout view when patients obtain lumbar MRI to standardize the vertebral numbering technique. To date, there has been no other method for accurate numeration of a transitional vertebral segment, other than counting caudally from C2. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae; Radiograph; Vertebral counting; Vertebral numbering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):705-7 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Nov;31(10 ):1778-86 - PubMed
    1. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Feb;29(1):35-48 - PubMed
    1. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(1):63-8 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jan;12(1):47-55 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources