Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity
- PMID: 29565193
- PMCID: PMC6151157
- DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1446421
Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity
Abstract
We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risk factors and the maternal morbidity associated with unintended extensions of the hysterotomy during caesarean delivery. We evaluated 2707 women who underwent low-transverse caesarean deliveries in 2011 at an academic, tertiary-care hospital. Hysterotomy extensions were identified through operative reports. Of the 2707 caesarean deliveries, 392 (14.5%) had an unintended hysterotomy extension. On the multivariable regression modelling, neonatal weight (OR 1.42; 95%CI 1.17-1.73), the arrest of labour [first-stage arrest (2.42; 1.73-3.38); second-stage arrest (5.54; 3.88-7.90)] and a non-reassuring foetal status (1.65; 1.20-2.25) were significantly associated with hysterotomy extensions. Hysterotomy extensions were significantly associated with an increased morbidity including an estimated blood loss >1200 millilitres (2.06; 1.41-3.02), a decline in postoperative haemoglobin ≥3.7 g/dL (2.07; 1.35-3.17), an evaluation for lower urinary tract injury (5.58; 3.17-9.81), and a longer operative time (8.11; 6.33-9.88). Based on these results, we conclude that unintended hysterotomy extensions significantly increase the maternal morbidity of caesarean deliveries. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Maternal morbidity associated with caesarean delivery (CD) is significantly greater than that in vaginal delivery. Unintended extensions of the hysterotomy occur in approximately 4-8% of CDs and are more common after a prolonged second stage of labour. The morbidity associated with hysterotomy extensions has been incompletely evaluated. What do the results of this study add? We demonstrate a rate of hysterotomy extension in a general obstetric population of approximately 15%, which is higher than previously reported estimates, and represents a potential doubling of the rate of the unintended hysterotomy extensions in recent years. The most significant risk factor for a hysterotomy extension was a second-stage labour arrest with a fourfold increase in the frequency of extensions. A hysterotomy extension is a significant independent risk factor for an intraoperative haemorrhage, a drop in postoperative haemoglobin, an intraoperative evaluation for lower urinary tract injury, and longer CD operative times. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A second-stage arrest is a strong independent risk factor for a hysterotomy extension. Recent re-evaluations of the labour curve that extend the second stage of labour will likely increase the frequency of CDs performed after a prolonged second stage. In these scenarios, obstetricians should be prepared for an unintended hysterotomy extension and for the possibility of a longer procedure with the increased risks of blood loss and the need for evaluation of the lower urinary tract.
Keywords: Caesarean section; caesarean delivery; extension; hysterotomy; morbidity; retrospective.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Similar articles
-
The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Apr;6(4):101326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101326. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 38447679
-
Risk Factors and Maternal Morbidity Associated with Unintentional Hysterotomy Extension at the Time of Cesarean Delivery.Am J Perinatol. 2019 Aug;36(10):1054-1059. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676112. Epub 2018 Nov 30. Am J Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 30500960
-
Unintended Upper Uterine Wall Extensions at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: Risk Factors and Associated Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.Am J Perinatol. 2025 Apr;42(5):572-579. doi: 10.1055/a-2408-7813. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Am J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 39227036
-
Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy during cesarean delivery decreases maternal morbidity: a meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):128.e1-128.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.231. Epub 2021 Apr 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33894151
-
Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):684.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.050. Epub 2014 Jun 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24983682
Cited by
-
Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258049. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34597319 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetrician views on Fetal Pillow® device use and research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Oct;64(5):506-513. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13824. Epub 2024 Apr 18. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024. PMID: 38634663 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Asicioglu O, Gungorduk K, Asicioglu BB, Yildirim G, Gungorduk OC, Ark C. Unintended extension of the lower segment uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of sharp versus blunt techniques. American Journal of Perinatology. 2014b;31:837–844. - PubMed
-
- Asicioglu O, Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Asicioglu BB, Gungorduk OC, Ark C, et al. Second-stage vs first-stage caesarean delivery: comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014a;34:598–604. - PubMed
-
- CDC. Centers for Control Disease and Prevention: Causes of pregnancy-related death in the United States. 2011–2012 [Internet]; [cited 2016 Oct5]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html.
-
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Siesto G, Loverro G, Bolis P. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;199:292 e1–296. - PubMed
-
- Curtin S, Gregory K, Korst L, Uddin S. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Maternal morbidity of vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: New data from the birth certificate, 2013; p. 64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical