Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Dec;20(12):1544-1553.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.35. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial

Kurt D Christensen et al. Genet Med. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Great uncertainty exists about the costs associated with whole-genome sequencing (WGS).

Methods: One hundred cardiology patients with cardiomyopathy diagnoses and 100 ostensibly healthy primary care patients were randomized to receive a family-history report alone or with a WGS report. Cardiology patients also reviewed prior genetic test results. WGS costs were estimated by tracking resource use and staff time. Downstream costs were estimated by identifying services in administrative data, medical records, and patient surveys for 6 months.

Results: The incremental cost per patient of WGS testing was $5,098 in cardiology settings and $5,073 in primary care settings compared with family history alone. Mean 6-month downstream costs did not differ statistically between the control and WGS arms in either setting (cardiology: difference = -$1,560, 95% confidence interval -$7,558 to $3,866, p = 0.36; primary care: difference = $681, 95% confidence interval -$884 to $2,171, p = 0.70). Scenario analyses showed the cost reduction of omitting or limiting the types of secondary findings was less than $69 and $182 per patient in cardiology and primary care, respectively.

Conclusion: Short-term costs of WGS were driven by the costs of sequencing and interpretation rather than downstream health care. Disclosing additional types of secondary findings has a limited cost impact following disclosure.

Keywords: cardiology; costs; economics; primary care; whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. McGuire is a consultant for Human Longevity outside the submitted work. Dr. Green receives compensation for speaking or consultation from AIA, GenePeeks, Helix, Illumina, Ohana, Prudential and Veritas, and is co-founder and advisor to Genome Medical, Inc. Dr. Dukhovny reports consulting for Vermont Oxford Network, Gerson Lehrman Group, and ClearView Healthcare Partners and being faculty for Vermont Oxford Network outside the submitted work.

References

    1. McCarthy JJ, McLeod HL, Ginsburg GS. Genomic medicine: a decade of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(189):189sr184–189sr184. - PubMed
    1. Manolio TA. Incorporating whole-genome sequencing into primary care: falling barriers and next steps. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(3):204–205. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong K. Can genomics bend the cost curve? JAMA. 2012;307(10):1031–1032. - PubMed
    1. Phillips KA, Ann Sakowski J, Trosman J, Douglas MP, Liang S-Y, Neumann P. The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know. Genet Med. 2014;16(3):251–257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatz MH, Schremser K, Rogowski WH. Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(5):443–455. - PubMed

Publication types