Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1987 May;35(5):511-5.

[Teicoplanin and Gram-positive coccus infections. Results of a multicenter study on 66 cases]

[Article in French]
  • PMID: 2956564
Clinical Trial

[Teicoplanin and Gram-positive coccus infections. Results of a multicenter study on 66 cases]

[Article in French]
J B Dureux et al. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1987 May.

Abstract

Sixty-six cases of Gram positive infections were treated with teicoplanin in an open multicenter study, comprising 7 centers in Eastern France. There were 38 male patients and 28 females. Teicoplanin was given at a dose of 400 mg daily for a mean duration of 18.4 days. The most common infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus, found in 43 out of 56 documented cases. 69 (89.9%) of the 78 Gram + strains isolated had an MIC for teicoplanin of less than or equal to 2 mg/l. There were 44 serious infections (30 septicemia, 10 endocarditis, 1 joint and bone infection, 2 mediastinitis, 1 toxic shock syndrome) and 22 less serious infections (4 urinary infections, 14 skin and soft tissue infections, 3 lower respiratory infections, 1 hepatic abscess). In 42 cases concurrent medication was given: beta-lactamase in 11 cases, rifampicin in 10 cases, aminoglycosides in 22, phosphomycin in 3, pefloxacin in 5. The clinical cure and improvement rate was 90.10%. Adverse events were reported in 11 patients, and in only 3 cases was the therapy stopped. All were reversible on stopping therapy. Teicoplanin was found to be well tolerated and effective in the treatment of Gram positive infections in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources