Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;14(S1):S5-S11.
doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0019.

Childhood Obesity Declines Project: A Different Methodology

Laura Kettel Khan  1 , Phyllis Ottley  2 , Carole Harris  3 , Nicola Dawkins-Lyn  3 , Carrie Dooyema  1 , Jan Jernigan  1 , Tina Kauh  4 , Deborah Young-Hyman  5
Affiliations

Childhood Obesity Declines Project: A Different Methodology

Laura Kettel Khan et al. Child Obes. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The evidence for and our understanding of community-level strategies such as policies, system, and environmental changes that support healthy eating and active living is growing. However, researchers and evaluation scientists alike are still not confident in what to recommend for preventing or sustaining declines in the prevalence of obesity.

Methods: The Systematic Screening and Assessment (SSA) methodology was adapted as a retrospective process to confirm obesity declines and to better understand what and how policies and programs or interventions may contribute as drivers. The Childhood Obesity Declines (COBD) project's adaptation of the SSA methodology consisted of the following components: (1) establishing and convening an external expert advisory panel; (2) identification and selection of sites reporting obesity declines; (3) confirmation and review of what strategies occurred and contextual factors were present during the period of the obesity decline; and (4) reporting the findings to sites and the field.

Results/discussion: The primary result of the COBD project is an in-depth examination of the question, "What happened and how did it happen in communities where the prevalence of obesity declined?" The primary aim of this article is to describe the project's methodology and present its limitations and strengths.

Conclusions: Exploration of the natural experiments such that occurred in Anchorage, Granville County, New York City, and Philadelphia is the beginning of our understanding of the drivers and contextual factors that may affect childhood obesity. This retrospective examination allows us to: (1) describe targeted interventions; (2) examine the timeline and summarize intervention implementation; (3) document national, state, local, and institutional policies; and (4) examine the influence of the reach and potential multisector layering of interventions.

Keywords: community interventions; evaluation; methods; natural experiments; obesity; obesity prevention; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

The authors did not report any conflicts of interest or financial disclosures. The findings and conclusions of this report are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ICF, National Institutes of Health, or Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Figures

<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.
Childhood Obesity Declines site exclusion and selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wang Y, Hyunjung L. The global childhood obesity epidemic and the association between socio-economic status and childhood obesity. Int Rev Psychiatry 2012;24:176–188 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietz WH, Economos CD. Progress in the control of childhood obesity. Pediatrics 2015;135:e559. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: Solving the Weight of the Nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012 - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Evaluating Obesity Prevention Efforts: A Plan for Measuring Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013 - PubMed
    1. Leviton LC, Kettel Khan L, Dawkins N. (eds). The Systematic Screening and Assessment Method: Finding Innovations Worth Evaluating. New Directions for Evaluation No. 125. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010

Publication types