Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Mar 23;18(1):204.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3019-8.

Brain injury rehabilitation after road trauma in new South Wales, Australia - insights from a data linkage study

Jane Wu  1 , Steven G Faux  2 , Christopher J Poulos  3 , Ian Harris  4
Affiliations
Observational Study

Brain injury rehabilitation after road trauma in new South Wales, Australia - insights from a data linkage study

Jane Wu et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Population-based patterns of care studies are important for trauma care but conducting them is expensive and resource-intensive. Linkage of routinely collected administrative health data may provide an efficient alternative. The aims of this study are to describe the rehabilitation pathway for trauma survivors and to analyse the brain injury rehabilitation outcomes in the two care settings (specialist brain injury and non-specialist general rehabilitation units).

Methods: This is an observational study using routinely collected registry data (New South Wales Trauma Registry linked with the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Inpatient Dataset). The study cohort includes 268 road trauma patients who were admitted to trauma services between 2009 and 2012 and received inpatient rehabilitation because of a brain injury.

Results: Of those who need inpatient rehabilitation, 62% (n = 166) were admitted to specialist units with the remainder (n = 102) admitted to non-specialist units. Those admitted to a specialist units were younger (p < 0.001), had a lower cognitive FIM score (p = 0.003) on admission than those admitted to non-specialist units. Specialist units achieved better overall FIM score improvements from admission to discharge (43 vs 30 points, p > 0.001) but at a cost of longer length of stay (median 47 vs 24 days, p < 0.001). There were very few discharges to residential aged care facilities from rehabilitation (2% in non-specialist units and none from specialist units). There was a long time lag between trauma and admission to inpatient rehabilitation with only a quarter of the patients admitted to a specialist unit by end of week four. Few older patients (19%) with brain injury were admitted to specialist units.

Conclusions: It is feasible to use routinely collected registry data to monitor inpatient rehabilitation outcomes of trauma care. There were differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to specialist units compared with non-specialist units.

Keywords: Data linkage; Rehabilitation; Road trauma; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/CIPHS/55). De-identified data was obtained for this study from the custodians of NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management (NSW Health) and AROC. They obtained their data through a process of opt-out consent.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study cohort extracted from a linked dataset
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dinh MM, Bein KJ, Gabbe BJ, Byrne CM, Petchell J, Lo S, et al. A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian major trauma Centre. Injury. 2014;45(5):830–834. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gabbe BJ, Lyons RA, Fitzgerald MC, Judson R, Richardson J, Cameron PA. Reduced population burden of road transport-related major trauma after introduction of an inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):565–572. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000522. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon WA, Zafonte R, Cicerone K, Cantor J, Brown M, Lombard L, et al. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: state of the science. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(4):343–382. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000202106.01654.61. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rice-Oxley M, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of brain injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(Suppl 1):7–24. doi: 10.1191/026921599668051623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carney N, Chesnut RM, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(3):277–307. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources