Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review
- PMID: 29566721
- PMCID: PMC5863824
- DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6
Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials for identification of efficient and effective new diagnostic and treatment modalities are needed to address disproportionately high burden of communicable (e.g., HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria) and non-communicable diseases (e.g., diabetes) in developing countries. However, gross under-representation in global clinical trial platforms contributes to sustained health inequity in these countries. We reviewed the literature on barriers facing clinical researchers in developing countries for conducting clinical trials in their countries.
Methods: Literature indexed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library were searched. Grey literature was also searched. Search key words included barriers, challenges, clinical trials and developing countries. Articles within the scope of this review were appraised by two reviewers.
Results: Ten studies, which are reported in 15 papers, were included in this review. Following critical review we identified five unifying themes for barriers. Barriers for conducting clinical trials included lack of financial and human capacity, ethical and regulatory system obstacles, lack of research environment, operational barriers and competing demands.
Conclusion and recommendation: There were substantial barriers at system, organization and individual level. We propose that to address this problem, instituting a system for wider implementation of local investigator-initiated trials is warranted. These trials are more applicable to local populations because they build on local healthcare knowledge. They are more demand-led, influence policy and responsive to a country's needs because they are driven by a local or national agenda.
Keywords: Barriers; Clinical trials; Developing countries.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- United Nations . World population prospect. 2015.
-
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global comparative assessments in the health sector: disease burden, expenditures and intervention packages. 1994.
-
- Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
-
- World Bank. Countries and economies. Geneva: World Bank; 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical