Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis
- PMID: 29567071
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30108-6
Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves survival of patients with stage II-III, resectable gastric cancer. However, the overall survival benefit observed after adjuvant chemotherapy is moderate, suggesting that not all patients with resectable gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy benefit from it. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive test for adjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with resectable, stage II-III gastric cancer.
Methods: In this multi-cohort, retrospective study, we developed through a multi-step strategy a predictive test consisting of two rule-based classifier algorithms with predictive value for adjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis. Exploratory bioinformatics analyses identified biologically relevant candidate genes in gastric cancer transcriptome datasets. In the discovery analysis, a four-gene, real-time RT-PCR assay was developed and analytically validated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from an internal cohort of 307 patients with stage II-III gastric cancer treated at the Yonsei Cancer Center with D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (n=193) or surgery alone (n=114). The same internal cohort was used to evaluate the prognostic and chemotherapy response predictive value of the single patient classifier genes using associations with 5-year overall survival. The results were validated with a subset (n=625) of FFPE tumour samples from an independent cohort of patients treated in the CLASSIC trial (NCT00411229), who received D2 gastrectomy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy (n=323) or surgery alone (n=302). The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival.
Findings: We identified four classifier genes related to relevant gastric cancer features (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4, and CDX1) that formed the single patient classifier assay. In the validation cohort, the prognostic single patient classifier (based on the expression of GZMB, WARS, and SFRP4) identified 79 (13%) of 625 patients as low risk, 296 (47%) as intermediate risk, and 250 (40%) as high risk, and 5-year overall survival for these groups was 83·2% (95% CI 75·2-92·0), 74·8% (69·9-80·1), and 66·0% (60·1-72·4), respectively (p=0·012). The predictive single patient classifier (based on the expression of GZMB, WARS, and CDX1) assigned 281 (45%) of 625 patients in the validation cohort to the chemotherapy-benefit group and 344 (55%) to the no-benefit group. In the predicted chemotherapy-benefit group, 5-year overall survival was significantly improved in those patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery compared with those who received surgery only (80% [95% CI 73·5-87·1] vs 64·5% [56·8-73·3]; univariate hazard ratio 0·47 [95% CI 0·30-0·75], p=0·0015), whereas no such improvement in 5-year overall survival was observed in the no-benefit group (72·9% [66·5-79·9] in patients who received chemotherapy plus surgery vs 72·5% [65·8-79·9] in patients who only had surgery; 0·93 [0·62-1·38], p=0·71). The predictive single patient classifier groups (chemotherapy benefit vs no-benefit) could predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in terms of 5-year overall survival in the validation cohort (pinteraction=0·036 in univariate analysis). Similar results were obtained in the internal evaluation cohort.
Interpretation: The single patient classifiers validated in this study provide clinically important prognostic information independent of standard risk-stratification methods and predicted chemotherapy response after surgery in two independent cohorts of patients with resectable, stage II-III gastric cancer. The single patient classifiers could complement TNM staging to optimise decision making in patients with resectable gastric cancer who are eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Further validation of these results in prospective studies is warranted.
Funding: Ministry of ICT and Future Planning; Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy; and Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Precision medicine in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):583-584. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30131-1. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29567072 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predictive Value of the nProfiler 1 Assay for the Efficacy of Adjuvant S-1-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Stage III Gastric Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Phase III Trial.Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jul;57(3):770-780. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.705. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 39529388 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
CT derived radiomic score for predicting the added benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery in stage I, II resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicohort study for outcome prediction.Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Mar;2(3):e116-e128. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30002-9. Epub 2020 Feb 13. Lancet Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 33334576
-
Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):315-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4. Epub 2012 Jan 7. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22226517 Clinical Trial.
-
[Clinical significance and efficacy of conversion surgery for patients with stage IV gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1087-1092. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 30370504 Review. Chinese.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 14;24(2):274-289. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29375213 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Novel Insight Into Fecal Occult Blood Test for the Management of Gastric Cancer: Complication, Survival, and Chemotherapy Benefit After R0 Resection.Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 11;10:526746. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.526746. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33643891 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges surrounding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for T2N0 gastric cancer.Oncol Lett. 2020 Nov;20(5):126. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11985. Epub 2020 Aug 19. Oncol Lett. 2020. PMID: 32934695 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognosis-related gene signature is enriched in cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stem-like subtype of gastric cancer.Clin Transl Med. 2022 Jun;12(6):e930. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.930. Clin Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 35754321 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Gene signature related to cancer stem cells and fibroblasts of stem-like gastric cancer predicts immunotherapy response.Clin Transl Med. 2023 Aug;13(8):e1347. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1347. Clin Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 37517036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ten Thousand Consecutive Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer: Perspectives of a Master Surgeon.Yonsei Med J. 2019 Mar;60(3):235-242. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.3.235. Yonsei Med J. 2019. PMID: 30799586 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical