Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 22;6(3):e68.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8849.

Patient and Family Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health Solution for Pediatric Asthma: Development and Feasibility Study

Andrew McWilliams #  1 , Kelly Reeves #  2 , Lindsay Shade #  2 , Elizabeth Burton #  3 , Hazel Tapp #  2 , Cheryl Courtlandt #  4 , Andrew Gunter #  4 , Michael F Dulin #  5
Affiliations

Patient and Family Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health Solution for Pediatric Asthma: Development and Feasibility Study

Andrew McWilliams et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a highly prevalent, chronic disease with significant morbidity, cost, and disparities in health outcomes. While adherence to asthma treatment guidelines can improve symptoms and decrease exacerbations, most patients receive care that is not guideline-based. New approaches that incorporate shared decision-making (SDM) and health information technology (IT) are needed to positively impact asthma management. Despite the promise of health IT to improve efficiency and outcomes in health care, new IT solutions frequently suffer from a lack of widespread adoption and do not achieve desired results, as a consequence of not involving end-users in design.

Objective: To describe a case study of a pediatric asthma SDM health IT solution's development and demonstrate a methodology for engaging actual patients and families in IT development. Perspectives are shared from the vantage point of the research team and a parent of a child with asthma, who participated on the development team.

Methods: We adapted user-centric design principles to engage actual users across three main development phases: project initiation, ideation, and usability testing. To facilitate the necessary level of user engagement, our approach included: (1) a Development Workgroup consisting of patients, caregivers, and providers who met regularly with the research team; and (2) "real-world users" consisting of patients, caregivers, and providers recruited from a variety of care locations, including safety-net clinics.

Results: Using this methodology, we successful partnered with asthma patients and families to create an interactive, digital solution called Carolinas Asthma Coach. Carolinas Asthma Coach incorporates SDM principles to elicit patient information, including goals and preferences, and provides health-literate, tailored education with specific guideline-based recommendations for patients and their providers. Of the patients, caregivers, and providers surveyed, 100% (n=60) said they would recommend Carolinas Asthma Coach to a friend or colleague. Qualitative feedback from users provided support for the usability and engaging nature of the app.

Conclusions: This project demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of deploying user-centric design methods that engage real patients and caregivers throughout the health IT design process.

Keywords: engagement; health information technology; pediatric asthma; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
User-centric design process to engage the Development Workgroup and real-world end-users.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process diagram for use of Carolinas Asthma Coach in a Primary Care Provider (PCP) visit setting.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Akinbami L, Moorman J, Bailey C, Zahran H, King M, Johnson C, Liu X. Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001-2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012 May;(94):1–8. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db94.pdf - PubMed
    1. Akinbami LJ, Sullivan SD, Campbell JD, Grundmeier RW, Hartert TV, Lee TA, Smith RA. Asthma outcomes: healthcare utilization and costs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Mar;129(3 Suppl):S49–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.984. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22386509 S0091-6749(11)02953-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moorman J, Rudd R, Johnson C, King M, Minor P, Bailey C, Scalia M, Akinbami LJ, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National surveillance for asthma--United States, 1980-2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Oct 19;56(8):1–54. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5608a1.htm ss5608a1 - PubMed
    1. Skrepnek G, Skrepnek SV. Epidemiology, clinical and economic burden, and natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Jul;10(5 Suppl):S129–38. http://www.ajmc.com/pubMed.php?pii=2635 2635 - PubMed
    1. American Lung Association Trends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality. 2012. Sep, [2017-08-26]. http://www.lung.org/finding-cures/our-research/trend-reports/asthma-tren... .

LinkOut - more resources