Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Dec;104(6):1191-1198.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1072. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Cytochrome P450 3A Induction Predicts P-glycoprotein Induction; Part 2: Prediction of Decreased Substrate Exposure After Rifabutin or Carbamazepine

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cytochrome P450 3A Induction Predicts P-glycoprotein Induction; Part 2: Prediction of Decreased Substrate Exposure After Rifabutin or Carbamazepine

Justin D Lutz et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Rifampin demonstrated dose-dependent relative induction between cytochrome P (CYP)3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), or CYP2C9; P-gp, OATP, and CYP2C9 induction was one drug-drug interaction (DDI) category lower than that observed for CYP3A across a wide range of pregnane X receptor (PXR) agonism. The objective of this study was to determine if these relationships could be utilized to predict transporter induction by other CYP3A inducers (rifabutin and carbamazepine) and of another P-gp substrate, sofosbuvir. Healthy subjects received sofosbuvir and a six-probe drug cassette before and after 300 mg q.d. rifabutin or 300 mg b.i.d. carbamazepine. Induction of P-gp, CYP2C9, and decreased sofosbuvir exposure were successfully predicted by observed CYP3A induction. Carbamazepine induction of OATP was underpredicted, likely due to reported additional non-PXR agonism. The results demonstrate that the effect of a PXR agonist on CYP3A can be leveraged to inform on induction liability for other primarily PXR-regulated P450s/transporters, allowing for prioritization of targeted DDI assessments during new drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prediction of induction between P‐gp, CYP2C9, and CYP3A. The black points and error bars are observed AUCR mean and 90% CI, respectively, after coadministration with the indicated inducer. The blue lines are the induction relationship between P‐gp and CYP2C9 and CYP3A. Blue areas are predicted P‐gp and CYP2C9 DDI category based on CYP3A or CYP2C9 induction. Weak, moderate, and strong induction classification is denoted as W, M, and S, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prediction of OATP induction from CYP3A and CYP2C9 induction. The black points and error bars are observed AUCR mean and 90% CI, respectively, after coadministration with the indicated inducer. The blue lines are the induction relationships between CYP3A, CYP2C9, and OATP. Blue areas are predicted OATP DDI category based on CYP3A or CYP2C9 induction. Weak, moderate, and strong induction classification is denoted as W, M, and S, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prediction of P‐gp or OATP (rosuvastatin) induction from OATP induction (pravastatin). The black points and error bars are observed AUCR mean and 90% CI, respectively, after coadministration with the indicated inducer. The blue line is the induction relationship between P‐gp or OATP (ROS) and OATP (PRA). Blue areas are predicted P‐gp DDI category based on OATP induction. Weak, moderate, and strong induction classification is denoted as W, M, and S, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prediction of sofosbuvir exposure decrease after inducer coadministration. The black points and error bars are observed AUCR mean and 90% CI, respectively, after coadministration with the indicated inducer. The blue line is the predicted induction relationship between SOF and MDZ AUCR. Blue areas are predicted SOF DDI category based on MDZ induction by the indicated inducer. Weak, moderate, and strong induction classification is denoted as W, M, and S, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Christians, U. , Schmitz, V. , Haschke, M. Functional interactions between P‐glycoprotein and CYP3A in drug metabolism. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 1, 641–654 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Francis, G.A. , Fayard, E. , Picard, F. , Auwerx, J. Nuclear receptors and the control of metabolism. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 261–311 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Gerbal‐Chaloin, S. et al Induction of CYP2C genes in human hepatocytes in primary culture. Drug Metab. Dispos. 29, 242–251 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Lemmen, J. , Tozakidis, I.E. & Galla, H.J. Pregnane X receptor upregulates ABC‐transporter Abcg2 and Abcb1 at the blood‐brain barrier. Brain Res. 1491, 1–13 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Synold, T.W. , Dussault, L. & Forman, B.M. The orphan nuclear receptor SXR coordinately regulates drug metabolism and efflux. Nat. Med. 7, 584–590 (2001). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms