Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;53(4):395-403.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-68-17. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

Shoulder Taping and Neuromuscular Control

Affiliations

Shoulder Taping and Neuromuscular Control

Suzanne J Snodgrass et al. J Athl Train. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Scapular taping can offer clinical benefit to some patients with shoulder pain; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Understanding these mechanisms may guide the development of treatment strategies for managing neuromusculoskeletal shoulder conditions.

Objective: To examine the mechanisms underpinning the benefits of scapular taping.

Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Setting: University laboratory.

Patients or other participants: A total of 15 individuals (8 men, 7 women; age = 31.0 ± 12.4 years, height = 170.9 ± 7.6 cm, mass = 73.8 ± 14.4 kg) with no history of shoulder pain.

Intervention(s): Scapular taping.

Main outcome measure(s): Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess the (1) magnitude and onset of contraction of the upper trapezius (UT), lower trapezius (LT), and serratus anterior relative to the contraction of the middle deltoid during active shoulder flexion and abduction and (2) corticomotor excitability (amplitude of motor-evoked potentials from transcranial magnetic stimulation) of these muscles at rest and during isometric abduction. Active shoulder-flexion and shoulder-abduction range of motion were also evaluated. All outcomes were measured before taping, immediately after taping, 24 hours after taping with the original tape on, and 24 hours after taping with the tape removed.

Results: Onset of contractions occurred earlier immediately after taping than before taping during abduction for the UT (34.18 ± 118.91 milliseconds and 93.95 ± 106.33 milliseconds, respectively, after middle deltoid contraction; P = .02) and during flexion for the LT (110.02 ± 109.83 milliseconds and 5.94 ± 92.35 milliseconds, respectively, before middle deltoid contraction; P = .06). These changes were not maintained 24 hours after taping. Mean motor-evoked potential onset of the middle deltoid was earlier at 24 hours after taping (tape on = 7.20 ± 4.33 milliseconds) than before taping (8.71 ± 5.24 milliseconds, P = .008). We observed no differences in peak root mean square EMG activity or corticomotor excitability of the scapular muscles among any time frames.

Conclusions: Scapular taping was associated with the earlier onset of UT and LT contractions during shoulder abduction and flexion, respectively. Altered corticomotor excitability did not underpin earlier EMG onsets of activity after taping in this sample. Our findings suggested that the optimal time to engage in rehabilitative exercises to facilitate onset of trapezius contractions during shoulder movements may be immediately after tape application.

Keywords: electromyography; muscle contraction; physical therapy techniques; rehabilitation; scapula; shoulder pain; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Application of rigid athletic tape to scapula consistent with the technique described by McConnell and McIntosh and McConnell et al.37
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contraction onset of the upper trapezius muscle relative to that of the middle deltoid during flexion and abduction tasks through all 4 time points of the experiment. a Indicates electromyographic onset of the middle deltoid contraction. b Indicates difference (P = .02; mean difference = 59.77 milliseconds; 95% confidence interval = 7.34, 112.20 milliseconds).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Contraction onset of the lower trapezius muscle relative to that of the middle deltoid in flexion and abduction tasks through all 4 time points of the experiment. a Approaches a difference (P = .06; mean difference = 104.09 milliseconds; 95% confidence interval = −1.96, 210.13 milliseconds). b Indicates electromyographic onset of the middle deltoid contraction.

References

    1. Luime J., Koes B., Hendriksen I., et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population: a systematic review. . 2004; 33 2: 73– 81. - PubMed
    1. Berth A., Pap G., Neuman W., Awiszus F. Central neuromuscular dysfunction of the deltoid muscle in patients with chronic rotator cuff tears. . 2009; 10 3: 135– 141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander CM. Altered control of the trapezius muscle in subjects with non-traumatic shoulder instability. . 2007; 118 12: 2664– 2671. - PubMed
    1. Michener LA., McClure PW., Karduna AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. . 2003; 18 5: 369– 379. - PubMed
    1. Ludewig PM., Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. . 2000; 80 3: 276– 291. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources