Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec:228-229:159-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker

Affiliations
Review

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker

Mersedeh Rohanizadegan. Cancer Genet. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Despite all the advances in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, a large number of patients suffer from late diagnosis or recurrence of their disease. Current available imaging modalities do not reveal micrometastasis and tumor biopsy is an invasive method to detect early stage or recurrent cancer, signifying the need for an inexpensive, non-invasive diagnostic modality. Cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been tried for early detection and targeted therapy of breast cancer, but its diagnostic and prognostic utility is still under investigation. This review summarizes the existing evidence on the use of ctDNA specifically in breast cancer, including detection methods, diagnostic accuracy, role in genetics and epigenetics evaluation of the tumor, and comparison with other biomarkers. Current evidence suggests that increasing levels of ctDNA in breast cancer can be of significant diagnostic value for early detection of breast cancer although the sensitivity and specificity of the methods is still suboptimal. Additionally, ctDNA allows for characterizing the tumor in a non-invasive way and monitor the response to therapy, although discordance of ctDNA results with direct biopsy (i.e. due to tumor heterogeneity) is still considered a notable limitation.

Keywords: Biomarker; Breast cancer; Circulating tumor DNA; Disease progression; Liquid biopsy; Response to therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The author claims no conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Primary care for survivors of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1086–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010123431506. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coughlin SS, Ekwueme DU. Breast cancer as a global health concern. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33:315–18. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:49–56. - PubMed
    1. Vetto JT, Luoh SW, Naik A. Breast cancer in pre-menopausal women. Curr Probl Surg. 2009;46:944–1004. S0011-3840(09)00104-X [pii]10.1067/j.cpsurg.2009.07.002. - PubMed

Publication types