Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;21(11):2149-2159.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000599. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: is it fit for purpose?

Affiliations
Review

A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: is it fit for purpose?

Caroline M Taylor et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Public health messages to reduce Hg exposure for pregnant women have focused exclusively on advice on fish consumption to limit Hg exposure, with little account being taken of the positive contribution of fish to nutritional quality. The aim of the present review was to compare and contrast the content and presentation of national guidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy, and comment on their evidence base and impact on consumption.

Design: We searched for national and international guidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy using Internet search strategies. The detailed content and style of presentation of the guidelines were compared. The evidence base for the guidelines, and evidence for the impact of the guidelines on fish consumption levels, were assessed.

Results: We identified nineteen national guidelines and three international guidelines. There was great variation in the content, complexity and presentation style. The guidelines were based largely on the Hg content of fish with far less consideration being given to the positive beneficial effects of nutrients provided by fish. The complexity of the guidelines may lead to pregnant women reducing their fish intake, or not eating fish at all.

Conclusions: Guidelines on fish consumption in pregnancy should take the beneficial effects of fish into account. Guidelines need to be clear and memorable, and appropriately disseminated, to achieve impact. Guidelines could include visual rather than narrative content. Use of technology, for example apps, could enable women to record their fish consumption in real time and log compliance with guidance over a week or other time period.

Keywords: Advisories; Fish; Guidelines; Mercury; Pregnancy; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hylander LD & Meili M (2003) 500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions. Sci Total Environ 304, 13–27. - PubMed
    1. Nriagu J & Becker C (2003) Volcanic emissions of mercury to the atmosphere: global and regional inventories. Sci Total Environ 304, 3–12. - PubMed
    1. Golding J, Steer CD, Gregory S et al.. (2016) Dental associations with blood mercury in pregnant women. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 44, 216–222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Copan L, Fowles J, Barreau T et al.. (2015) Mercury toxicity and contamination of households from the use of skin creams adulterated with mercurous chloride (Calomel). Int J Environ Res Public Health 12, 10943–10954. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose M, Baxter M, Brereton N et al.. (2010) Dietary exposure to metals and other elements in the 2006 UK Total Diet Study and some trends over the last 30 years. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 27, 1380–1404. - PubMed

Publication types