Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 5;2(4):349-360.
doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00465. eCollection 2018 Apr 1.

Health and Cardiometabolic Disease in Transgender Adults in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2015

Natalie J Nokoff  1   2 , Sharon Scarbro  3   4   5 , Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga  4   6 , Kerrie L Moreau  7   8   9 , Allison Kempe  1   2   4
Affiliations

Health and Cardiometabolic Disease in Transgender Adults in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2015

Natalie J Nokoff et al. J Endocr Soc. .

Abstract

Context: Little is known about the health of transgender adults in the United States, a growing population. There have been no large reports examining differences in health status and cardiometabolic disease in subgroups of transgender adults [female-to-male (FTM), male-to-female (MTF), and gender nonconforming (GNC)] in the United States.

Objective: Compare the health status and prevalence of cardiometabolic disease among specific subgroups of transgender adults (FTM, MTF, GNC) with those of cisgender adults in the United States.

Design: Secondary data analysis based on the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey.

Setting: The 22 states in the United States that asked about transgender identity.

Participants: Noninstitutionalized adults age ≥18 years who reside in the United States, identified through telephone-based methods.

Main outcome measures: Data were extracted for respondents who answered the transgender identity question. Weighted percentages are given for all measures. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) are reported for health status and cardiometabolic disease measures.

Results: FTM adults have a higher odds of being uninsured than both cisgender women [OR 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1 to 7.1] and cisgender men (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.7). MTF adults have a higher odds of reporting myocardial infarction than cisgender women (OR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.3) but not cisgender men.

Conclusions: There are significant differences in health status measures and cardiometabolic health between subgroups of transgender adults and cisgender adults. There is a need for additional research to understand the societal and medical (e.g., hormone therapy) effects on these outcomes.

Keywords: gender nonconforming; health insurance; myocardial infarction; transgender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Odds of self-reported health status measures among transgender subgroups vs cisgender men and women. Forest plots depicting adjusted ORs and lower 95% confidence intervals (LCIs) and upper 95% confidence intervals (UCIs) for health status measures among (a) FTM vs cisgender men and women, (b) MTF vs cisgender men and women, (c) GNC-M vs cisgender men, and (d) GNC-F vs cisgender women. Comparisons on the basis of natal sex are depicted with a solid line (FTM vs Cis F, MTF vs Cis M, GNC-M vs Cis M, GNC-F vs Cis F), and comparisons on the basis of gender identity are depicted with a dashed line (FTM vs Cis M, MTF vs Cis F). Cis F, cisgender female, female sex and female gender identity; Cis M, cisgender male, male sex and male gender identity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Odds of self-reported cardiometabolic disease among transgender subgroups vs cisgender adults. Forest plots depicting adjusted ORs and lower 95% confidence intervals (LCIs) and upper 95% confidence intervals (UCIs) 95% CIs for cardiometabolic disease measures among (a) FTM vs cisgender men and women, (b) MTF vs cisgender men and women, (c) GNC-M vs cisgender men, and (d) GNC-F vs cisgender women. Comparisons on the basis of natal sex are depicted with a solid line (FTM vs Cis F, MTF vs Cis M, GNC-M vs Cis M, GNC-F vs Cis F), and comparisons on the basis of gender identity are depicted with a dashed line (FTM vs Cis M, MTF vs Cis F). Cis F, cisgender female, female sex and female gender identity; Cis M, cisgender male, male sex and male gender identity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Meyer IH, Brown TNT, Herman JL, Reisner SL, Bockting WO. Demographic characteristics and health status of transgender adults in select US regions: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2014. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(4):582–589. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crissman HP, Berger MB, Graham LF, Dalton VK. Transgender demographics: a household probability sample of US adults, 2014. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(2):213–215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baum J, Brill S, Brown J, Delpercio A, Kahn E, Kenney L, Nicoll A. Supporting and Caring for Our Gender Expansive Youth: Lessons From the Human Rights Campaign’s Youth Survey. Washington, DC: Human Rights Campaign Foundation and Gender Spectrum; 2012. Accessed 28 November 2017. www.hrc.org/youth-gender.
    1. Grant JM, Mottet LA, Tanis J, Herman JL, Harrison J, Keisling M. National Transgender Discrimination Survey Report on Health and Health Care. Washington,DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Washington; 2010:1–23.
    1. Grant JM, Mottet L, Tanis JE, Harrison J, Herman J, Keisling M. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington,DC: National Center for Transgender Equality; 2011.

LinkOut - more resources