Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):197.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0.

Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol

Affiliations

Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol

Katie Gillies et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.

Methods: This research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders' perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.

Discussion: We believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants' experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.

Keywords: Dropout; Intervention; Interviews; Non-retention; Retention; Theory; Trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was granted ethical approval by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (NoSRES) Committee in September 2017 (ref: 17/NS/0086). We will ensure that informed consent is sought from all participants prior to their recruitment into the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

ST is a senior editor with Trials. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
STEER protocol overview

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pocock S. Clinical trials: a practical approach. London: Wiley; 1984.
    1. Walsh M, Sackett D, Deveraux PJ. When RCT participants are lost to follow up. Why even a few can matter. Clin Trials. 2015;12:537–539. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597702. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation For Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) http://www.spirit-statement.org/. Accessed 13 June 2017.
    1. Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, Molnar AO, Dattani ND, Burke A, Guyatt G, Thabane L, Walter SD, Pogue J, Devereaux PJ. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brueton VC, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I, Rait G. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:MR000032. 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources