Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol
- PMID: 29580260
- PMCID: PMC5869766
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol
Abstract
Background: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.
Methods: This research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders' perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.
Discussion: We believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants' experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.
Keywords: Dropout; Intervention; Interviews; Non-retention; Retention; Theory; Trials.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was granted ethical approval by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (NoSRES) Committee in September 2017 (ref: 17/NS/0086). We will ensure that informed consent is sought from all participants prior to their recruitment into the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
ST is a senior editor with
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
The development of theory-informed participant-centred interventions to maximise participant retention in randomised controlled trials.Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06218-8. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35395930 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.Trials. 2015 Oct 27;16:484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1011-8. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26507504 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
'Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment' - the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials.Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2467-0. Trials. 2018. PMID: 29378618 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2544-4. Trials. 2018. PMID: 29490702 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Behavioural approaches to recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a systematic mapping review.BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e054854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054854. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35264354 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07577-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35232455 Free PMC article.
-
What influences communication about retention in randomised trials: a multi-trial, theory-based analysis exploring trial staff perspectives.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01708-4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 36002801 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Navigating Real-World Randomized Clinical Trials: The 'Parents as Teachers' Experience.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(8):1082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081082. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39200691 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of nurse-led reviews for inflammatory rheumatological conditions: A qualitative study.J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Apr 13;11:26335565211002402. doi: 10.1177/26335565211002402. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. J Multimorb Comorb. 2021. PMID: 33912472 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pocock S. Clinical trials: a practical approach. London: Wiley; 1984.
-
- Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation For Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) http://www.spirit-statement.org/. Accessed 13 June 2017.
-
- Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, Molnar AO, Dattani ND, Burke A, Guyatt G, Thabane L, Walter SD, Pogue J, Devereaux PJ. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources