Long-Term Results for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: Comparing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection
- PMID: 29580779
- PMCID: PMC6375491
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.049
Long-Term Results for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: Comparing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection
Abstract
Background: Lobectomy has been compared with sublobar resection for the treatment of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurate long-term data are lacking on the risk of recurrence in routine clinical practice. This study used a unique and representative dataset to compare recurrence, overall survival (OS), and lymph node staging between lobectomy and sublobar resection.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons performed a Special Study of the National Cancer Data Base, by reabstracting records to augment NSCLC data with enhanced information on preoperative comorbidity and cancer recurrence from 2007 to 2012. For patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) for clinical stage IA NSCLC, propensity matching and competing risks models compared 5-year OS and risk of cancer recurrence. Secondary measures included lymph nodes collected, pathologic upstaging, and surgical margin status.
Results: A total of 1,687 patients with stage IA NSCLC were identified (1,354 who underwent lobectomy, and 333 who had sublobar resections). Propensity matching yielded 325 pairs. Lobectomy and sublobar resection groups had similar 5-year OS (61.8% vs 55.6%, p = 0.561). The sublobar group had a 39% increased risk of NSCLC recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.87). Median lymph node counts were higher for lobectomy-treated patients (7 [3, 10] vs 1 [0, 4], p < 0.001)].
Conclusions: In an enhanced national dataset representative of outcomes for stage IA NSCLC, sublobar resection was associated with a 39% increased risk of cancer recurrence. The majority of patients treated with sublobar resection had an inadequate lymph node assessment. These real-world results must be considered when existing clinical trial results comparing these treatments are extrapolated for clinical use.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
The problem with sublobar resections.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3224-S3226. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.102. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30370120 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Failure to Harvest Lymph Nodes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr;107(4):1287. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30391246 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr;107(4):1287. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30557536 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 No non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:615–622.. - PubMed
-
- McMurry TL, Shah PJ, Samson P, Robinson CG, Kozower BD. Treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: What’s trending? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154:1080–1087.. - PubMed
-
- Harada H, Okada M, Sakamoto T, Matsuoka H, Tsubota N. Functional advantage after radical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80:2041–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
