Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 26;20(3):e102.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.9552.

Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis

Dorien Lanssens  1   2 , Thijs Vandenberk  1 , Christophe Jp Smeets  1   3 , Hélène De Cannière  1   3 , Sharona Vonck  2   4 , Jade Claessens  1 , Yenthel Heyrman  1 , Dominique Vandijck  4   5 , Valerie Storms  1 , Inge M Thijs  1   6 , Lars Grieten  1 , Wilfried Gyselaers  1   2   7
Affiliations

Prenatal Remote Monitoring of Women With Gestational Hypertensive Diseases: Cost Analysis

Dorien Lanssens et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Remote monitoring in obstetrics is relatively new; some studies have shown its effectiveness for both mother and child. However, few studies have evaluated the economic impact compared to conventional care, and no cost analysis of a remote monitoring prenatal follow-up program for women diagnosed with gestational hypertensive diseases (GHD) has been published.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the costs of remote monitoring versus conventional care relative to reported benefits.

Methods: Patient data from the Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study were used. Health care costs were calculated from patient-specific hospital bills of Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Genk, Belgium) in 2015. Cost comparison was made from three perspectives: the Belgian national health care system (HCS), the National Institution for Insurance of Disease and Disability (RIZIV), and costs for individual patients. The calculations were made for four major domains: prenatal follow-up, prenatal admission to the hospital, maternal and neonatal care at and after delivery, and total amount of costs. A simulation exercise was made in which it was calculated how much could be demanded of RIZIV for funding the remote monitoring service.

Results: A total of 140 pregnancies were included, of which 43 received remote monitoring (30.7%) and 97 received conventional care (69.2%). From the three perspectives, there were no differences in costs for prenatal follow-up. Compared to conventional care, remote monitoring patients had 34.51% less HCS and 41.72% less RIZIV costs for laboratory test results (HCS: mean €0.00 [SD €55.34] vs mean €38.28 [SD € 44.08], P<.001; RIZIV: mean €21.09 [SD €27.94] vs mean €36.19 [SD €41.36], P<.001) and a reduction of 47.16% in HCS and 48.19% in RIZIV costs for neonatal care (HCS: mean €989.66 [SD €3020.22] vs mean €1872.92 [SD €5058.31], P<.001; RIZIV: mean €872.97 [SD €2761.64] vs mean €1684.86 [SD €4702.20], P<.001). HCS costs for medication were 1.92% lower in remote monitoring than conventional care (mean €209.22 [SD €213.32] vs mean €231.32 [SD 67.09], P=.02), but were 0.69% higher for RIZIV (mean €122.60 [SD €92.02] vs mean €121.78 [SD €20.77], P<.001). Overall HCS costs for remote monitoring were mean €4233.31 (SD €3463.31) per person and mean €4973.69 (SD €5219.00) per person for conventional care (P=.82), a reduction of €740.38 (14.89%) per person, with savings mainly for RIZIV of €848.97 per person (23.18%; mean €2797.42 [SD €2905.18] vs mean €3646.39 [SD €4878.47], P=.19). When an additional fee of €525.07 per month per pregnant woman for funding remote monitoring costs is demanded, remote monitoring is acceptable in their costs for HCS, RIZIV, and individual patients.

Conclusions: In the current organization of Belgian health care, a remote monitoring prenatal follow-up of women with GHD is cost saving for the global health care system, mainly via savings for the insurance institution RIZIV.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; gestational hypertensive diseases; reimbursement; remote monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total amount of costs for remote monitoring (RM) and conventional care (CC) groups paid by health care service (HCS), National Institution for Insurance of Disease and Disability (RIZIV), and patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total amount of costs plus remote monitoring for remote monitoring (RM) and conventional care (CC) groups paid by health care service (HCS), National Institution for Insurance of Disease and Disability (RIZIV), and patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Corwin MJ, Mou SM, Sunderji SG, Gall S, How H, Patel V, Gray M. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of home uterine activity monitoring: pregnancy outcomes for all women randomized. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1281–1285.S0002-9378(96)70041-8 - PubMed
    1. Wapner RJ, Cotton DB, Artal R, Librizzi RJ, Ross MG. A randomized multicenter trial assessing a home uterine activity monitoring device used in the absence of daily nursing contact. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Mar;172(3):1026–1034.0002-9378(95)90038-1 - PubMed
    1. Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Whiteman V, Bower M, Berger P, Geifman-Holtzman O, Bove AA. Use of an internet-based telemedicine system to manage underserved women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun;9(3):297–306. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.0034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pérez-Ferre N, Galindo M, Fernández MD, Velasco V, Runkle I, de la Cruz MJ, Martín RP, Del Valle L, Calle-Pascual AL. The outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus after a telecare approach are not inferior to traditional outpatient clinic visits. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:386941. doi: 10.1155/2010/386941. doi: 10.1155/2010/386941. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pérez-Ferre N, Galindo M, Fernández MD, Velasco V, de la Cruz MJ, Martín P, del Valle L, Calle-Pascual AL. A telemedicine system based on Internet and short message service as a new approach in the follow-up of patients with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;87(2):e15–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.002.S0168-8227(09)00496-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types