Patient-Centered Obstetric Care in the Age of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Prenatal Screening
- PMID: 29582008
- PMCID: PMC5862378
- DOI: 10.1177/2374373517720482
Patient-Centered Obstetric Care in the Age of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Prenatal Screening
Abstract
Purpose: The clinical introduction of innovative prenatal genetic technologies challenges patients and providers to find new ways of fostering informed decision-making in a setting characterized by complexity and uncertainty. As prenatal genetic technology advances, important questions remain about how to structure patient-centered conversations that effectively prepare pregnant patients to make informed choices about the different genetic conditions for which this new form screening may be used.
Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 23 pregnant women to identify informational needs and decision-making preferences regarding emerging and anticipated applications of cell-free fetal DNA screening, the newest form of prenatal genetic screening.
Results: Participants were in favor of obtaining more genetic information about the fetus than provided by conventional screens but acknowledged the challenges inherent in navigating the unique complexities of the decision-making process. The provider-patient relationship was seen as an important resource to navigate the associated uncertainties at each stage of the screening process. Participants emphasized the need for initiatives to support a personalized, accurate, and unbiased discussion about prenatal genetic risk and assessment.
Conclusion: Continued advances in prenatal genetic screening call for new approaches to structure patient-centered communication to facilitate increasingly complex decisions about fetal genetic risk and assessment.
Keywords: cell-free fetal DNA screening; informed decision-making; obstetric care; patient experience; patient–provider communication.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
The personal utility of cfDNA screening: Pregnant patients' experiences with cfDNA screening and views on expanded cfDNA panels.J Genet Couns. 2020 Feb;29(1):88-96. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1183. Epub 2019 Nov 3. J Genet Couns. 2020. PMID: 31680382
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 4;21(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04282-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34863134 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic era.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 8. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018. PMID: 29233487 Review.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
Making the most of the first prenatal visit: The challenge of expanding prenatal genetic testing options and limited clinical encounter time.Prenat Diagn. 2020 Sep;40(10):1265-1271. doi: 10.1002/pd.5752. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Prenat Diagn. 2020. PMID: 32441820 Free PMC article.
-
Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05423-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36927679 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2570. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152570. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-Provider Satisfaction and Communication in U.S. Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review.Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1485-1494. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03952-0. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Matern Child Health J. 2024. PMID: 38850378 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(5):1-38. eCollection 2019. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019. PMID: 30838086 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Norton ME, Brar H, Weiss J, Karimi A, Laurent LC, Caughey AB, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207:137.e1–e8. - PubMed
-
- Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, Madankumar R, Saffer C, Das AF, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:799–808. - PubMed
-
- Hooks J, Wolfberg AJ, Wang ET, Struble CA, Zahn J, Juneau K, et al. Non-invasive risk assessment of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy through directed analysis and incorporation of fetal fraction. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:496–9. - PubMed
-
- Nicolaides KH, Musci TJ, Struble CA, Syngelaki A, Gil MM. Assessment of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy using directed cell-free DNA analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;35:1–6. - PubMed
-
- Wapner RJ, Babiarz JE, Levy B, Stosic M, Zimmermann B, Sigurjonsson S, et al. Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2015;212:332–e1. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous