Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;32(3):1185-1193.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15087. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Evaluation of updated sepsis scoring systems and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and their association with sepsis in equine neonates

Affiliations

Evaluation of updated sepsis scoring systems and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and their association with sepsis in equine neonates

D M Wong et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2018 May.

Abstract

Background: The original equine sepsis score provided a method of identifying foals with sepsis. New variables associated with sepsis have been evaluated, but the sepsis score has not been updated.

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 updated sepsis scores and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in regard to detecting sepsis in foals.

Animals: Two-hundred and seventy-three ill foals and 25 healthy control foals.

Methods: Historical, physical examination, and clinicopathologic findings were used to calculate the original sepsis score and 2 updated sepsis scores. SIRS criteria were also evaluated. Sepsis scores and positive SIRS scores were statistically compared to foals with sepsis.

Results: One-hundred and twenty-six foals were septic and 147 sick-nonseptic. The original and updated sepsis scores were significantly higher in septic foals as compared to sick-nonseptic and healthy foals. The sensitivity and specificity of the updated sepsis scores to predict sepsis were not significantly better than those of the original sepsis score. One-hundred and twenty-seven of 273 (46.5%) foals met the original SIRS criteria and 88/273 (32%) foals met the equine neonatal SIRS criteria. The original SIRS criteria had similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting sepsis as did the 3 sepsis scores in our study.

Conclusions and clinical importance: The updated sepsis scores did not provide improved ability in predicting sepsis. Fulfilling the original SIRS criteria provided similar sensitivity and specificity in predicting sepsis as the modified sepsis score and might serve as a diagnostic aid in identifying foals at risk for sepsis.

Keywords: SIRS; foal; infection; septic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Updated sepsis score using the equine neonatal SIRS criteria (score 2)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for 3 sepsis scores to predict sepsis. Score 1: diamond; Score 2: triangle; Score 3: cross

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen ND. Causes of and farm management factors associated with disease and death in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994;204:1644–1651. - PubMed
    1. Borchers A, Wilkins PA, Marsh PM. Association of admission L‐lactate concentration in hospitalized equine neonates with presenting complaint, periparturient events, clinical diagnosis and outcome: a prospective multicenter study. Equine Vet J. 2012;44:57–63. - PubMed
    1. Giguere S, Weber EJ, Sanchez LC. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in 1065 equine neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. Equine Vet J. 2017;49:45–50. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Troger B, Hartel C, Buer J, et al. Clinical relevance of pathogens detected by multiplex PCR in blood of very‐low‐birth weight infants with suspected sepsis‐multicenter study of the German Neonatal Network. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159821–e0159810. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms