Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;15(4):611.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040611.

In-Cabin Air Quality during Driving and Engine Idling in Air-Conditioned Private Vehicles in Hong Kong

Affiliations

In-Cabin Air Quality during Driving and Engine Idling in Air-Conditioned Private Vehicles in Hong Kong

Natasha Maria Barnes et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Many people spend lengthy periods each day in enclosed vehicles in Hong Kong. However, comparably limited data is available about in-cabin air quality in air-conditioned private vehicles, and the car usage that may affect the air quality. Fifty-one vehicles were tested for particulate matter (PM0.3 and PM2.5), total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO₂), airborne bacteria, and fungi levels during their routine travel journey. Ten of these vehicles were further examined for PM0.3, PM2.5, TVOCs, CO, and CO₂ during engine idling. In general, during driving PM2.5 levels in-cabin reduced overtime, but not PM0.3. For TVOCs, 24% vehicles exceeded the recommended Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) level in offices and public places set by the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department. The total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) concentration positively correlated with the age of the vehicle. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels in all of the vehicles were lower than the IAQ recommendation, while 96% vehicles exceeded the recommended CO₂ level of 1000 ppmv; 16% vehicles >5000 ppmv. Microbial counts were relatively low. TVOCs levels at idle engine were higher than that during driving. Although the time we spend in vehicles is short, the potential exposure to high levels of pollutants should not be overlooked.

Keywords: air-conditioned vehicles; idle engine; in-cabin air quality; volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) parameters in the in-cabin microenvironment during driving, particulate matter (PM)2.5 (a); PM0.3 (b); carbon monoxide (CO) (c); CO2 (d); total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) (e); Airborne Bacteria (f); and, Airborne Fungi (g). As there are no IAQ guidelines for PM0.3 and PM2.5, the PM2.5 levels were compared with the levels recorded in different districts in Hong Kong.
Figure 1
Figure 1
The Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) parameters in the in-cabin microenvironment during driving, particulate matter (PM)2.5 (a); PM0.3 (b); carbon monoxide (CO) (c); CO2 (d); total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) (e); Airborne Bacteria (f); and, Airborne Fungi (g). As there are no IAQ guidelines for PM0.3 and PM2.5, the PM2.5 levels were compared with the levels recorded in different districts in Hong Kong.
Figure 1
Figure 1
The Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) parameters in the in-cabin microenvironment during driving, particulate matter (PM)2.5 (a); PM0.3 (b); carbon monoxide (CO) (c); CO2 (d); total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) (e); Airborne Bacteria (f); and, Airborne Fungi (g). As there are no IAQ guidelines for PM0.3 and PM2.5, the PM2.5 levels were compared with the levels recorded in different districts in Hong Kong.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The IAQ parameters in the in-cabin microenvironment during engine idling, PM2.5 (a); PM0.3 (b); CO (c); CO2 (d); and, TVOCs (e). As there are no IAQ guidelines for PM0.3 and PM2.5, the PM2.5 levels were compared with the levels recorded in different districts in Hong Kong.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The IAQ parameters in the in-cabin microenvironment during engine idling, PM2.5 (a); PM0.3 (b); CO (c); CO2 (d); and, TVOCs (e). As there are no IAQ guidelines for PM0.3 and PM2.5, the PM2.5 levels were compared with the levels recorded in different districts in Hong Kong.

References

    1. Müller D., Klingelhöfer D., Uibel S., Groneberg D.A. Car indoor air pollution-analysis of potential sources. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2011;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-6-33. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung P.L., Harrison R.M. Roadside and in-vehicle concentrations of monoaromatic hydrocarbons. Atmos. Environ. 1999;33:191–204. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00147-2. - DOI
    1. Zhu Y., Eiguren-Fernandez A., Hinds W.C., Miguel A.H. In-cabin commuter exposure to ultrafine particles on Los Angeles freeways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:2138–2145. doi: 10.1021/es0618797. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geiss O., Tirendi S., Barrero-Moreno J., Kotzias D. Investigation of volatile organic compounds and phthalates present in the cabin air of used private cars. Environ. Int. 2009;35:1188–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudda N., Kostenidou E., Sioutas C., Delfino R.J., Fruin S.A. Vehicle and driving characteristics that influence in-cabin particle number concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:8691–8697. doi: 10.1021/es202025m. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources