Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;13(3):e0194927.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194927. eCollection 2018.

"I am not telling. The mobile is telling": Factors influencing the outcomes of a community health worker mHealth intervention in India

Onaedo Ilozumba  1   2 , Marjolein Dieleman  1 , Nadine Kraamwinkel  1 , Sara Van Belle  2 , Murari Chaudoury  3 , Jacqueline E W Broerse  1
Affiliations

"I am not telling. The mobile is telling": Factors influencing the outcomes of a community health worker mHealth intervention in India

Onaedo Ilozumba et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Improving maternal health outcomes remains a priority in Low and Middle Income Countries. With the rapid proliferation of mobile health technologies, there is an increased interest in understanding how these technologies can effectively improve maternal health outcomes particularly maternal health seeking knowledge and behaviors. However, few studies present clear explanations of the program developers' rationale (theory of change) and contextual factors that could influence program outcomes. This mixed-methods study assesses Mobile for Mothers, a community health workers (CHW) utilized maternal mHealth intervention. We present the program developers' rationale and utilize it as a framework to guide our study that aimed to identify intervention-related and contextual factors, which influence the observed outcomes of a CHW, utilized mHealth intervention.

Materials and methods: Quantitative methods (a questionnaire with 740 women who received the intervention and survey of 57 CHWs who utilized the intervention) and qualitative methods (12 interviews and 4 group discussions with CHWs and 20 interviews and 5 group discussions with pregnant and lactating women and 15 interviews and 2 group discussions with men) were conducted. These were used to understand how the mHealth intervention was implemented and to gain insight into contextual factors that potentially influenced the observed intervention outcomes.

Results: Results were grouped following three categories: (1) perceptions and experiences of CHWs utilizing the mHealth technology; (2) CHW-related outcomes; and (3) contextual factors that influence maternal health-seeking behavior. The overall response of CHWs and community members to the intervention was positive. However, contextual factors like the relationship between the CHWs and their respective communities, the pregnant women's decision-making power and lack of access due to financial influenced the observed outcomes.

Conclusion: Mobile health applications are promising interventions for improving the performance of CHWs and health-seeking behavior of pregnant women. However, the contextual factors play a crucial role in intervention outcomes and need to be explicated by program developers during intervention design and implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Lewin S, Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Daniels K, Bosch-Capblanch X, van Wyk BE, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2010; CD004015 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bigirwa P. Effectiveness of Community Health Workers (CHWS) in the Provision of Basic Preventive and Curative Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Interventions: A Systematic Review. Heal Policy Dev. 2009;7 Available: http://www.hrhresourcecenter.org/node/5268
    1. Agarwal S, Perry HB, Long L-A, Labrique AB. Evidence on feasibility and effective use of mHealth strategies by frontline health workers in developing countries: systematic review. Trop Med Int Heal. 2015;20: 1003–1014. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12525 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mechael PN. The Case for mHealth in Developing Countries. Innov Technol Governance, Glob. MIT Press 238 Main St., Suite 500, Cambridge, MA 02142–1046 USA journals-info@mit.edu; 2009;4: 103–118. doi: 10.1162/itgg.2009.4.1.103 - DOI
    1. Istepanian RSH, Jovanov E, Zhang YT. Introduction to the special section on m-Health: Beyond seamless mobility and global wireless health-care connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 20048: 405–414. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2004.840019 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types