Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1164-8.

Applying interprofessional Team-Based Learning in patient safety: a pilot evaluation study

Affiliations

Applying interprofessional Team-Based Learning in patient safety: a pilot evaluation study

Lukas Lochner et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) interventions are not always successful in achieving learning outcomes. Team-Based Learning (TBL) would appear to be a suitable pedagogical method for IPE, as it focuses on team performance; however, little is known about interprofessional TBL as an instructional framework for patient safety. In this pilot-study, we aimed to (1) describe participants' reactions to TBL, (2) observe their achievement with respect to interprofessional education learning objectives, and (3) document their attitudinal shifts with regard to patient safety behaviours.

Methods: We developed and implemented a three-day course for pre-qualifying, non-medical healthcare students to give instruction on non-technical skills related to 'learning from errors'. The course consisted of three sequential modules: 'Recognizing Errors', 'Analysing Errors', and 'Reporting Errors'. The evaluation took place within a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study design. Participants completed self-assessments through valid and reliable instruments such as the Mennenga's TBL Student Assessment Instrument and the University of the West of England's Interprofessional Questionnaire. The mean scores of the individual readiness assurance tests were compared with the scores of the group readiness assurance test in order to explore if students learned from each other during group discussions. Data was analysed using descriptive (i.e. mean, standard deviation), parametric (i.e. paired t-test), and non-parametric (i.e. Wilcoxon signed-rank test) methods.

Results: Thirty-nine students from five different bachelor's programs attended the course. The participants positively rated TBL as an instructional approach. All teams outperformed the mean score of their individual members during the readiness assurance process. We observed significant improvements in 'communication and teamwork' and 'interprofessional learning' but not in 'interprofessional interaction' and 'interprofessional relationships.' Findings on safety attitudes and behaviours were mixed.

Conclusion: TBL was well received by the students. Our first findings indicate that interprofessional TBL seems to be a promising pedagogical method to achieve patient safety learning objectives. It is crucial to develop relevant clinical cases that involve all professions. Further research with larger sample sizes (e.g. including medical students) and more rigorous study designs (e.g. pre-test post-test with a control group) is needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Keywords: Interprofessional education; Learning from errors; Patient safety; Pre-qualifying non-medical healthcare students; Team-based learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was presented to the Institutional Scientific Review Board of Claudiana – College of Healthcare Professions, Bolzano/Bozen, Italy (Protocol 11/3/2015). The study was granted ethical approval. Students gave their consent to participate in the study by filling out and sending back the questionnaires. To guarantee anonymity no personal information was collected. Students generated a unique code on the questionnaire that allowed us to connect their pre-test and post-test questionnaires.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in british hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001;322:517–519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent C. Patient safety. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i85–i90. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. West MA, Guthrie JP, Dawson JF, Borrill CS, Carter M. Reducing patient mortality in hospitals: the role of human resource management. J Organiz Behav. 2006;27:983–1002. doi: 10.1002/job.396. - DOI

Publication types