Choice of Intracoronary Imaging: When to use Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography
- PMID: 29588699
- PMCID: PMC5808711
- DOI: 10.15420/icr.2016:6:1
Choice of Intracoronary Imaging: When to use Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
Intracoronary imaging has the capability of accurately measuring vessel and stenosis dimensions, assessing vessel integrity, characterising lesion morphology and guiding optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary angiography used to detect and assess coronary stenosis severity has limitations. The 2D nature of fluoroscopic imaging provides lumen profile only and the assessment of coronary stenosis by visual estimation is subjective and prone to error. Performing PCI based on coronary angiography alone is inadequate for determining key metrics of the vessel such as dimension, extent of disease, and plaque distribution and composition. The advent of intracoronary imaging has offset the limitations of angiography and has shifted the paradigm to allow a detailed, objective appreciation of disease extent and morphology, vessel diameter, stent size and deployment and healing after PCI. It has become an essential tool in complex PCI, including rotational atherectomy, in follow-up of novel drug-eluting stent platforms and understanding the pathophysiology of stent failure after PCI (e.g. following stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis). In this review we look at the two currently available and commonly used intracoronary imaging tools - intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography - and the merits of each.
Keywords: Intracoronary imaging; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherence tomography.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Garcia-Garcia HM, Gogas BD, Serruys PW, Bruining N. IVUS-based imaging modalities for tissue characterization: similarities and differences. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:215–24. 10.1007/s10554-010-9789-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gogas BD, Farooq V, Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM. Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by IVUS and IVUSbased imaging modalities: progression and regression studies, tissue composition and beyond. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:225–37. 10.1007/s10554-010-9791-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478–92. - PubMed
-
- Prati F, Guagliumi G, Mintz GS et al. Expert review document part 2: methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2513–20. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Terashima M, Kaneda H, Suzuki T. The role of optical coherence tomography in coronary intervention. Korean J Intern Med. 2012;27:1–12. 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.1.1 epub ahead of press. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
