Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;9(2):115-120.
doi: 10.15420/icr.2011.9.2.115.

Review of Data and Discussion - Who Should Undergo Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 2014?

Affiliations

Review of Data and Discussion - Who Should Undergo Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 2014?

Amit Bhan et al. Interv Cardiol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

A patent foramen ovale is a relatively common finding in the general population and is associated with a number of conditions, including cryptogenic stroke. In 2014, percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a frequently performed procedure; the bulk of these procedures being carried out for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke, along with other indications, such as prevention of decompression illness, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine. Of these conditions the largest body of evidence available is for cryptogenic stroke and there is ongoing debate of the benefit of PFO closure over medical therapy. This article will review the available evidence of PFO closure in each of these contexts, with a particular focus on randomised controlled trials, and endeavour to outline in whom the evidence suggests closure should be considered.

Keywords: Stroke; cryptogenic embolism; decompression illness; migraine; patent foramen ovale; platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Brian Clapp has received consulting/speaking fees from St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Abbott Medical. Amit Bhan has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krueger SK, Lappé DL. Right-to-left shunt through patent foramen ovale complicating right ventricular infarction. Successful percutaneous catheter closure. Chest. 1988;94:1100–1. - PubMed
    1. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:17–20. - PubMed
    1. Meissner I, Whisnant JP, Khandheria BK et al. Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: the SPARC study. Stroke Prevention: Assessment of Risk in a Community. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:862–9. - PubMed
    1. Tobis J, Shenoda M. Percutaneous treatment of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1722–32. - PubMed
    1. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR et al. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke. 1988;19:547–54. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources