Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194243.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194243. eCollection 2018.

Landscape connectivity for bobcat (Lynx rufus) and lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the Northeastern United States

Affiliations

Landscape connectivity for bobcat (Lynx rufus) and lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the Northeastern United States

Laura E Farrell et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Landscape connectivity is integral to the persistence of metapopulations of wide ranging carnivores and other terrestrial species. The objectives of this research were to investigate the landscape characteristics essential to use of areas by lynx and bobcats in northern New England, map a habitat availability model for each species, and explore connectivity across areas of the region likely to experience future development pressure. A Mahalanobis distance analysis was conducted on location data collected between 2005 and 2010 from 16 bobcats in western Vermont and 31 lynx in northern Maine to determine which variables were most consistent across all locations for each species using three scales based on average 1) local (15 minute) movement, 2) linear distance between daily locations, and 3) female home range size. The bobcat model providing the widest separation between used locations and random study area locations suggests that they cue into landscape features such as edge, availability of cover, and development density at different scales. The lynx model with the widest separation between random and used locations contained five variables including natural habitat, cover, and elevation-all at different scales. Shrub scrub habitat-where lynx's preferred prey is most abundant-was represented at the daily distance moved scale. Cross validation indicated that outliers had little effect on models for either species. A habitat suitability value was calculated for each 30 m2 pixel across Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine for each species and used to map connectivity between conserved lands within selected areas across the region. Projections of future landscape change illustrated potential impacts of anthropogenic development on areas lynx and bobcat may use, and indicated where connectivity for bobcats and lynx may be lost. These projections provided a guide for conservation of landscape permeability for lynx, bobcat, and species relying on similar habitats in the region.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Regional area of analyses.
Lynx habitat P–values mapped by 30 m2 pixel across Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, with bobcat and lynx study areas indicated.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Cumulative frequency distribution curves.
Cumulative frequency curve of P–values for bobcat (a) and lynx (b) locations, random locations within the study area, and random locations from the Northeastern region. Triangles indicate the location of maximum separation between species and random locations from each study area.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Present and predicted connectivity for bobcats.
Present (a) and predicted future (b) connectivity for bobcats between conserved areas of natural habitat in the Champlain Valley Biophysical Region (upper left), the Northern Piedmont area of Vermont (upper right) and below, along the Route 2 corridor from Vermont into southern Maine (bottom). The core polygons have a cost distance of 0, and are the basis of the orange areas in the maps. Connective habitat for bobcats is defined as pixels with a cost distance value ≤ 125,000 (small arrow on legend). Future connectivity between conserved areas was predicted only where anthropogenic change has been estimated by Trombulak et al. [30].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Present and predicted connectivity for lynx.
Present (a) and predicted future (b) connectivity for lynx between conserved areas of natural habitat in northeastern and southeastern Maine (left and middle, respectively), and between confirmed uncollared lynx locations from ME, NH, and VT (right). The core polygons have a cost distance of 0, and are the basis of the orange areas in the maps. Connective habitat for lynx is defined as pixels with a cost distance value ≤1,172,610 (small arrow on legend). Future connectivity between conserved areas was predicted only where anthropogenic change has been estimated by Trombulak et al. [30].
Fig 5
Fig 5. Subportion of area where connectivity is expected to decline.
The impact of future development on connective habitat for bobcats in a portion of southeastern Maine around Auburn and Lewiston. Black describes areas of connective habitat, white defines pixels with a cost distance value greater than 125,000, above the maximum cost distance value used by bobcats.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vashon J, McLellan S, Crowley S, Meehan A, Laustsen K. Canada lynx assessment. 2012. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. 107 p. http://www.maine.gov/ifw/docs/species_planning/mammals/canadalynx/Lynx%2...
    1. New Hampshire Fish and Game. Canada lynx documented in northern New Hampshire. 2011. http://www.wildlife.state.nh.us/Newsroom/News_2011/news_2011_Q4/lynx_doc.... Accessed 23 December 2011.
    1. Linforth J, Cliche R. Canada Lynx Coming Back to Vermont. 2013. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/map/ESA_success_stories/VT/VT_story2/. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
    1. Woolmer G, Trombulak SC, Ray JC, Doran PJ, Anderson MG, Baldwin RF, et al. Rescaling the human footprint: A tool for conservation planning at an ecoregional scale. Landsc and Urban Plan 2008;87: 42–53.
    1. Foster D, Donahue B, Kittredge D, Lambert F, Hunter M, Hall BR, et al. Wildlands and Woodlands—A Vision for the New England Landscape. Harvard Forest, Harvard University; Petersham, MA: 2010. 36 p.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources