Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0195061.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195061. eCollection 2018.

Correlation between coronary artery calcification by non-cardiac CT and Framingham score in young patients

Gabriel Lichtenstein  1 , Amichai Perlman  2 , Shoshana Shpitzen  1 , Ronen Durst  1   3 , Dorit Shaham  4 , Eran Leitersdorf  1   2 , Auryan Szalat  1   2
Affiliations

Correlation between coronary artery calcification by non-cardiac CT and Framingham score in young patients

Gabriel Lichtenstein et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have established a correlation between coronary artery calcification (CAC) measured by ECG-gated chest computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular disease. Recent reports which included asymptomatic patients suggest that CAC measured on non-ECG gated CT is similarly associated with cardiovascular risk. This study investigates the correlation between the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and an incidental finding of CAC on a non-gated chest CT performed for non-cardiac indications in young and seemingly healthy adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study that included 162 CT scans performed in young patients aged 18-50 years old for non-cardiac indications in our institution was conducted. CAC score (CACS) was calculated using the Agatston method. FRS was calculated and compared to the CACS using three different approaches. The correlations between the CACS and several specific factors (i.e. age, body mass index, smoking, statins, etc.), were also evaluated.

Results: Mean age of patients was 36.43 year old and 105 (64.8%) were male. We found a significant positive correlation between the CACS and the FRS in all three approaches (p<0.05). Increased age, smoking and statin use were the only individual factors clearly associated with an increase in CACS (p = 0.002, p = 0.045 and p = 0.009, respectively).

Conclusion: This is the first report indicating that incidental CACS identified in non-gated MDCT is also associated with cardiovascular risk evaluated by FRS in a young population. Our findings suggest that young asymptomatic individuals with incidental CAC should be seriously evaluated for cardiovascular risk factors despite presumption of belonging to a low cardiovascular risk category.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Calcification percentage by cardiovascular risk category.
FRS = Framingham risk score.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Categorical distribution of coronary calcification by categorical distribution of cardiovascular risk.
Observing the proportion of the cardiovascular risk groups in the different calcification categories, it is evident that the more calcification demonstrated, the smaller the lowest cardiovascular risk group (colored in blue) becomes. p value for linear trend = 0.04. CACS = Coronary artery calcium score; FRS = Framingham risk score.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Calcification as a binary categorical variable by quantitative cardiovascular risk.
Box plot showing bulk of higher Framingham risk score values in the calcification group. CACS = Coronary artery calcium score; FRS = Framingham risk score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):948–54. Epub 2010/02/24. doi: 121/7/948 [pii] doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97(18):1837–47. Epub 1998/05/29. . - PubMed
    1. Allan GM, Garrison S, McCormack J. Comparison of cardiovascular disease risk calculators. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25(4):254–65. Epub 2014/07/01. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000095 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr., Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–32. Epub 1990/03/15. doi: 0735-1097(90)90282-T [pii]. . - PubMed
    1. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, et al. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation. 1996;93(11):1951–3. Epub 1996/06/01. . - PubMed

Publication types