Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul;71(7):579-583.
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205071. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

Biomarkers of chondrosarcoma

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers of chondrosarcoma

Wonju Jeong et al. J Clin Pathol. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Clinical outcome prediction is major concern to patients with cancer. Various molecular markers in various carcinomas have been identified in the past few decades. However, accurate predictors in chondrosarcoma have not been developed, even though chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary bone tumour. Chondrosarcoma is the cartilage-forming malignancy and shows a wide spectrum of clinicopathological behaviours. The majority of chondrosarcoma grows slowly and rarely metastasises, and adequate surgery leads to a good prognosis. However, wide surgical excision is acquired in high-grade chondrosarcoma, because this tumour is highly resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. To decide best therapy, accurate diagnostic markers are also necessary in chondrosarcoma. It is reported that angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis increase by chondrosarcoma staging, and they are promoted by leptin and adiponectin. Several microRNAs to regulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and VEGF-C are also reported. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase and periostin are proposed as new biomarkers for differential diagnosis of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. This review summarises that chondrosarcoma diagnostic markers are currently reported.

Keywords: bone tumours; diagnosis; tumour markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD, et al. . The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist 2008;13:320–9. 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0237 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hogendoorn PC, Athanasou N, Bielack S, et al. . Bone sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010;21(Suppl 5):v204–v213. 10.1093/annonc/mdq223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR, Fedenko AN, et al. . Influence of cryosurgery on treatment outcome of low-grade chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;451:201–7. 10.1097/01.blo.0000229293.98850.5d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiner SD. Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of bone: clinical, radiologic, and histologic differentiation. Instr Course Lect 2004;53:645–9. - PubMed
    1. Ferrer-Santacreu EM, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, González-López JM, et al. . Enchondroma versus Low-Grade Chondrosarcoma in Appendicular Skeleton: Clinical and Radiological Criteria. J Oncol 2012;2012:1–6. 10.1155/2012/437958 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances