Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran
- PMID: 29593437
- PMCID: PMC5863713
- DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S150428
Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran
Abstract
Background: The patient package inserts (PPIs), which contain the necessary information about medications intended for patients, need to be expressed in a clear language comprehensible to everyone.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the readability and understandability of the drug package inserts for the inexpert people.
Methods: The readability of the 158 PPIs of the 33 drugs, registered and manufactured in Iran, was calculated. The main criterion for selecting PPIs to include in this study was of those top-selling drugs during the year 2015 according to the Social Security Organization in Iran. The PPIs were collected from the pharmacies of the three major cities, namely, Tabriz, Ardabil and Meshgin Shahr. Then, using the Flesch-Dayani readability (FDR) tool adjusted for the Persian language, the average number of the words and syllables was counted to calculate and grade the readability score of the selected PPIs.
Results: This study showed that the average FDR readability score for all the 33 drugs is 52.52, which are graded 10th-11th. Of the PPIs, 70.89% were difficult to read, and on average, the readability of the PPIs was five times difficult than the standard ones. Only 13.92% PPIs were suitable for the 5th-7th grade, and 15.19% of the package inserts ranked in the 8th-9th reading grade.
Conclusion: A considerable number of the PPIs in Iran have low readability level and were not suitable for the inexpert readers. Since the treatment cost is very high, people tend to use medications arbitrarily or simply use old prescriptions. This study suggests the necessity of a major improvement in the readability level of the PPIs in order to ensure the usefulness of the PPIs to the majority of the consumers.
Keywords: Flesch–Dayani indicator; Flesch–Dayani readability; drug guide; drug package insert; leaflet; patient package inserts; pharmaceutical brochures; readability.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Patient package insert readability and design.Am Pharm. 1994 Aug;NS34(8):48-53. doi: 10.1016/s0160-3450(15)30339-1. Am Pharm. 1994. PMID: 7942501
-
Improving meningococcal MenACWY and 4CMenB/meningococcal group B vaccine-related health literacy in patients: Importance of readability of pharmaceutical Patient Leaflets.J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):1109-1116. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13405. Epub 2021 Mar 25. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021. PMID: 33768562
-
Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 25;18(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5145. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27226241 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of quality and readability of over-the-counter medication package inserts.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3560-3567. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 25. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022. PMID: 35379561
-
Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions.J Child Orthop. 2023 May 16;17(3):284-290. doi: 10.1177/18632521231156435. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Child Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37288046 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the Readability of Medicine Information Materials: The Case of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital - Mixed Approach.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 22;15:635-644. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S302275. eCollection 2021. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021. PMID: 33790543 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of the Nursing Journal Club Perception Scale (NJCPS).J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jun 30;12:213. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1043_22. eCollection 2023. J Educ Health Promot. 2023. PMID: 37545988 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Medication Package Inserts in Ethiopia.J Environ Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;2022:8299218. doi: 10.1155/2022/8299218. eCollection 2022. J Environ Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35096074 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Receiving Written Medicine Information About Medicines: A Qualitative Study.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 9;15:569-580. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S298563. eCollection 2021. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021. PMID: 33727802 Free PMC article.
-
Worth the paper they are printed on? Findings from an independent evaluation of the understandability of patient information leaflets for antiseizure medications.Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2130-2143. doi: 10.1111/epi.17299. Epub 2022 May 31. Epilepsia. 2022. PMID: 35560228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singh KR, Munshi R, Arora D. Assessment of the degree of awareness among physicians and patients about drug package inserts. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(3):1338.
-
- Vander Stichele RH. Impact of written drug information in patient package inserts Acceptance and benefit/risk perception. Gent: Academia Press Scientific Publishers; 2004.
-
- Dass AS, Sarala N, Bhuvana K. Analysis of package inserts of drugs utilized in a tertiary care hospital. J Young Pharm. 2016;8(3):275.
-
- Gupta V, Pathak S. Assessment of awareness and knowledge about package inserts amongst medical students: a questionnaire based study. IOSR J Pharm. 2012;2(2):215–217.
-
- Piñero-López MÁ, Modamio P, Lastra CF, Mariño EL. Readability assessment of package inserts of biological medicinal products from the European medicines agency website. Drug Saf. 2014;37(7):543–554. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources